The new announcement that a new restaurant is going to be constructed in my neighbourhood rises people's attention. Due to possible noise all day round made by this restaurant and its customers, in many people's opinion, it is not an advisable proposal. Contrary to their viewpoints is my perspective that the new restaurant can benefit people considerably, due to its contributions to providing convenience of having meals and making frequent social interaction more possible.
Among all the benefits of building a new restaurant in our neighbourhood is the convenience provided for people who are too busy to cook for themselves. Citizens nowadays are leading a hustling and bustling lifestyle, and therefore restaurants with high walkability gain growing popularity among these citizens. Undoubtedly, the newly built restaurant in our neighbourhood can not only deprive people living in the surroundings of the hassle of preparing meals, but also help them save a huge amount of time. For example, even though my parents are extremely busy, they have to cook every day for three meals on account of the lack of restaurants surrounded our neighbourhood. I always hear from their complaints about that cooking is quite time-consuming as well as their hope for an accessible restaurant. Hence, I believe that the newly established restaurant is beneficial for my parents, since it can save quantities of their time and distract them from routine cooking.
Another primary benefit of the newly built restaurant revolves around the fact that it makes it easier for people living in the surroundings to have more social interaction with each other. It is an undisputed fact that never can two individuals maintain connected with merely occasional communication. To some extent, restaurants can function as a kind of social and vibrant platform, where residents can encounter and converse with diverse people. With constant and continuous interaction in the canteen, there is no doubt that some of them can form and keep a steady relationship and eventually become good friends. Take my friend's grandpa, once a lonely elderly, as an instance. He always has his breakfast in a local canteen and beside him, several other local people consume food there as well. With time going, the grandpa got acquainted with some of the latter and formed a firm friendship with them. As a result, the grandpa never feels lonely any more. Therefore, I believe the restaurant in our neighbourhood could serve in the same way as the canteen the grandpa often goes to. In other words, the canteen can enhance interaction and keep people away from being lonely and frustrated.
In a sum, I support to build a new restaurant in our neighbourhood in that it makes it more convenient for people to live and works as an interaction platform.
- Do you agree or disagree that progress is always good? Use specificreasons and examples to support your answer. 92
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 78
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 85
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 76
- In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 851, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... going, the grandpa got acquainted with some of the latter and formed a firm friendship wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, well, for example, kind of, no doubt, as a result, as well as, in other words, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2363.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 458.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15938864629 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03072891986 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521834061135 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9700805467 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.15 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0862735339502 0.236089414692 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308010900747 0.076458572812 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373717223475 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0728325883638 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345369587759 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.