It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Jobs occupy a great time span of our lives. One important issue about occupations is their working hours and working days. There is a hot debate among people that weather works should be in three days with long hours or in five days with shorter hours. I, personally, subscribe to the view that it is more pleasing to have a job that it is only three days a week with extended time due to providing more options for planning in the weekend, increasing the efficiency of the workers, and providing more time for the family members to be together. In- depth discussion on each of the reasons is presented below.
The first and probably the most important reason why I want to work three days a week with shorter hours is that I can use my time in the off- days of the week more efficient. That is, I will have more options to take as my weekend plan. For example, I can plan to learn another language on those days, while if I had only 2 days as my weekend, it would take a long time for me to learn another language.
One might consider this from another angle, which is the fact that the more you rest, the more efficient you will be. As reported in the scientific literature, people who gain more relaxing time period and have more free days are more motivated to go back to work. This implicates that by decreasing the working days, people will work better and more efficient in comparison with the case of 5 working days.
The last but not the least important reason is that if people have to work only 3 days a week, they can spend more time with their family on the other days which will have significant long- term effects on the society. According to statistics, children who spend more time near their parents are more academically successful in the future. As a result, not only working 3 days a week can provide more time for the family to be together but also it will eventually result in a more sustained society.
In a word, although it seems that working 5 days a week may have more productivity for the society, I believe that working in three days with shorter hours is more beneficial because it provides more options for the people to efficiently use their weekend days, it expands the resting days of the workers which will increase their motivation for their jobs, and it provides more time for the families to be together which will have substantial long- term effects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 71
- some people say that the internet provides a lot of valuable information, others think access to much information creates problems 73
- parent are the best teachers 78
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 78
- all children should be required to take a foreign language class from the time they starts school, until they begin university 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, while, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 436.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51605504587 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39682630233 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.426605504587 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.423868746 48.9658058833 209% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 131.266666667 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0666666667 20.6045352989 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13333333333 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441870248017 0.236089414692 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164949537707 0.076458572812 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951356809993 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294581225496 0.150856017488 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552408840562 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.1575268817 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.53 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.