It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends
Some people think that is more important to keep old friends than to make new friends, but someone thinks that is more important to make new friends. In my opinion, both are important. We need to keep old friends and make new friends. I will explain in the following essay why is important to keep our old friends and to make a new one.
Firstly, old friendships are stronger than a new one because the old friends know us better than new friends. They know our secrets and feelings. We can talk with them about our problems or listen to their problems and make a decision together. We can share with them everything because the old friendship is built on trust and they are part of our life. On the other hand, making new friends is also important because with meeting new people we enhance our circle of friends. Moreover, making new friends help us to improve our communication and comprehension ability. Today, on the social media we are meeting a lot of people from everywhere in the world. We can learn a new language and some of this friend can become our good friend.
Secondly, old friends know our strengths and weaknesses and can guide us better than new friends. They give us support when is a need and they are always by our side no matter what happens. New friendship takes a time to develop and to gain trust. Conversations with new friends are limited because we cannot talk about everything and share our problems because we do not know if they are reliable or not. However, making new friends will help introvert people to become more open to others and this will help them in future events such as a new job interview.
In conclusion, people are a creature that needs to live and communicate in society with other people. For this reason, people need to make new friends and to keep old friends.
- You are planning to study abroad. What do you think you will like and dislike about this experience? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 66
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is specific to these online encyclopedias, 73
- Summarize the main points in the lecture, and then explain how they cast doubt on the ideas in the reading passage. 3
- Many people have learned a foreign language in their own country others have learned a foreign language in the country in which it is spoken Which is better Give the advantages of each and support your viewpoint 91
- Summarize the main points in the lecture explain how they cast doubt on the ideas in the reading passage 47
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... old friends and to make a new one. Firstly, old friendships are stronger th...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is friend can become our good friend. Secondly, old friends know our stren...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...events such as a new job interview. In conclusion, people are a creature tha...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 327.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58409785933 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43897548336 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 212.727598566 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434250764526 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8654715734 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8947368421 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2105263158 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73684210526 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.477047046863 0.236089414692 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185831267211 0.076458572812 243% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173595084189 0.0737576698707 235% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.358957838398 0.150856017488 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160908101485 0.0645574589148 249% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.41 8.01818996416 80% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 86.8835125448 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.