Pets should be treated like family members. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons to support your opinion.
Many people in the world have pets. There are different reasons why some people have pets and why they treat them like family members and the one who do not have pets can not understand them. In my opinion, pets should be treated like family members.
First of all, pets can minimize stress. After a bad day playing with the pet make us to feel better and to forget our problems in a moment. Furthermore, they are good company, for instance, people who own a dog can go to a walk, also they feel more safe with their presence and barks. Moreover, people buy a pet for their children, because with the pet feeding, walking, cleaning and grooming children to become independent and responsible. In addition, pets can replace parents or another family members when they are at work for children not to feel alone. What`s more, they are a good companion to the elderly and help blind people to walk. Because of these reasons we need to treat them like family members.
On the other hand, people who do not have pets think that pets are dirty, smell bad, make a lot of mess at home and you need to go after them to clean up. Although, they think that pets are costly because you need to buy special food and to bring them to the veterinarian. And you need to separate a lot of time for them.
In spite of these thinks it is better to have a pet because they bring love and happiness to the family. They help us to reduce the stress, also children learn to be responsible and independent. As a result of these, we need to care about them and treat like family members, because if they are happy then they will show their thanks in different ways.
- TOEFL TPO 05 - Integrated Writing Task 71
- Summarize the main points in the lecture, and then explain how they cast doubt on the ideas in the reading passage. 73
- dinosaurs endotherm 68
- You are planning to study abroad. What do you think you will like and dislike about this experience? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 66
- Summarize the main points in the lecture, and then explain how they cast doubt on the ideas in the reading passage. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Many people in the world have pets. Ther...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld be treated like family members. First of all, pets can minimize stress. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 663, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... elderly and help blind people to walk. Because of these reasons we need to treat them ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eed to treat them like family members. On the other hand, people wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to separate a lot of time for them. In spite of these thinks it is better to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, for instance, in addition, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 305.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43278688525 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2603840824 2.67179642975 85% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485245901639 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.9 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.164438141 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3125 5.45110844103 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233253385913 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961367507986 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111238242333 0.0737576698707 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161066511886 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800406405372 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.7 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 86.8835125448 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.