It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own.
Our modern life is much more complicated than the three decades ago, and there are a lot of sources that people can use to get information about events happning in the world. while some people would like to watch news that are presented by another percpective, others agree with the obverse idea. Nevertheless, from my point of view, I think people should read or watch thnews that the presenters' opinion are not similar with our view. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, when anchors' views are different than our view, we can get a whole image of an important event, which is not possible when we read a news from similar interpretion. Nowadays, news play an important role in the community, and this is crucial that people understand what is happenign around them. In fact, looking from one side to an event cannot reveal all aspect of that, and we have to go byond our perspective. For example, some people use national television to watch news everyday, but presenters' views are always the same and restiricted by national policy and rights. This is obvious that we cannot get enugh information from these sources because they always try to show they have the same idea with people and with this approach they attempt to hide some part of events. Therefore, perople should watch other news programs that their view is different.
Furthermore, if we read a news that the writer's imagination is completely different than our view, this will help us to improve our personality by challenging our strong beliefs. All people have some unchangible values and believes that most of them are not correct, and a person who wants to enhance his or her personality should hear other ideas as well. The more we learn to deal with other opinions, the less we have difficulty to defence our wrong beliefs. Thus, if we spend some of our times to read or watch news from diffrent paople, it can be very helpful for us to bacame successful in our life. for example, TV news programs that have similar view with people advertise that life in the other countires is hard because of violence, uemployment rate and olitical difficulties, but if we watch news from other perspective we will find out that some of these news are incorrect. Thus, Although their presetation is totaly different than national TV, people who watch these programs get more comprehensive information about the other countries quality of life. Consequently, peoples' view to life gradually will change after watching these news programs.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that people should watch news that the presenters' idea is different. This is because we can get more information from all side of an events, and also this can promote our personality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-17 | Mitra-T | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | Hossein2000 | 90 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 80 | view |
| 2023-03-20 | redark777 | 90 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | janfaisal | 73 | view |
- technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 78
- Essay topics: for success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more imp than studying hard in school 73
- TPO- test25- young people nowadays do not give enough time to help their communities 76
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
- A teacher s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ion about events happning in the world. while some people would like to watch news th...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 387, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'presenters'' or 'presenter's'?
Suggestion: presenters'; presenter's
...le should read or watch thnews that the presenters opinion are not similar with our view. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 49, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
... with, when anchors views are different than our view, we can get a whole image of a...
^^^^
Line 2, column 147, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
...ent, which is not possible when we read a news from similar interpretion. Nowadays, ne...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 491, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...e use national television to watch news everyday, but presenters views are always the sa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
... is different. Furthermore, if we read a news that the writers imagination is complet...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...Furthermore, if we read a news that the writers imagination is completely different tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...ers imagination is completely different than our view, this will help us to improve ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...or us to bacame successful in our life. for example, TV news programs that have sim...
^^^
Line 3, column 861, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this news' or 'these newses'?
Suggestion: this news; these newses
...rspective we will find out that some of these news are incorrect. Thus, Although their pre...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 940, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...h their presetation is totaly different than national TV, people who watch these pro...
^^^^
Line 4, column 74, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'presenters'' or 'presenter's'?
Suggestion: presenters'; presenter's
... that people should watch news that the presenters idea is different. This is because we c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 164, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an event' or simply 'events'?
Suggestion: an event; events
...n get more information from all side of an events, and also this can promote our personal...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, i feel, i think, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2301.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 474.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85443037975 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61411815669 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46835443038 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 710.1 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.641375181 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.105263158 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9473684211 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57894736842 5.45110844103 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 5.5376344086 235% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311481225024 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122395991194 0.076458572812 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880687355561 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224857420137 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468703563809 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.