It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own.
After entering the internet era, innumerable information is waiting to flux into our brains and we have so many ways to access news, which is a double-edged sword because it gives us more choices as well as forces us to make choices in case of getting missed. Under this circumstance, some people hold that it is more important to get news from people whose views are different from ours than from people whose views are similar to ours. From my perspective, I am in favor of this view because I consider it beneficial for both our thinking patterns and cooperative work in the future to obtain news from people holding different views.
Firstly, reading and watching news presented by people from different perspectives prompt us to figure out the different sides of news in case of having partial understanding based on our limited knowledge. It is known that we only have limited energy and time to learn expertise in a specific field so that we are likely to observe something in a familiar but partial way. Therefore, getting news from other persons with different opinions gives us opportunities to treat a thing from a fresh aspect. For instance, I once heard of a piece of news from a friend that a white shark ate a swimming person in the sea and my first opinion about this news was that white sharks are too brutal. However, this friend majored in biology told me that actually, we couldn’t blame the white shark too much because the cause of this tragedy might not be the brutality of the white shark but the swimmer's ignorance about the marked swimming area. What drove the white shark to attack swimmers is always its territorial awareness rather than the nature of brutality because they don’t like to eat human flesh as food. His view broadened my knowledge as well as helped me have a more comprehensive understanding of the news.
Secondly, obtaining news from people holding different views helps us to gain the ability to understand others’ words when working with other people. If you only get news from people holding similar views as you, it is hard for you to know possible opinions from others’ perspectives. Furthermore, you are going to be trapped in your own world, having difficulties in discussing with your co-workers, which must be an obstacle of your career. A vivid example comes from one of my talented roommates, he is talented in data science and willing to regard everything in the world as expressions of maths. However, he cares about nothing beyond his field which makes him hard to cooperate with others. He failed many times when applying for jobs since he has trouble understanding the essence of questions asked by HRs. It is admitted that he may not need to work in a big company, however, the failure of applying for a job hurt his confidence to some extent. This pity actually can be solved if he spends a little of his time communicating with people from other perspectives.
To conclude, I insist that getting news from people holding different views is more important than from people with the same views as you.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-17 | Mitra-T | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | Hossein2000 | 90 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 80 | view |
| 2023-03-20 | redark777 | 90 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | janfaisal | 73 | view |
- Beliefs about elephants 76
- It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own 73
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long 73
- Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader 70
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 884, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'swimmers'' or 'swimmer's'?
Suggestion: swimmers'; swimmer's
...he brutality of the white shark but the swimmers ignorance about the marked swimming are...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as for, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 85.0 52.1666666667 163% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2551.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 532.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79511278195 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80261649409 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6551701693 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494360902256 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 789.3 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.8426239526 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.722222222 100.406767564 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5555555556 20.6045352989 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339587423715 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108824165819 0.076458572812 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112271604345 0.0737576698707 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227944451399 0.150856017488 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666861045968 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 58.1214874552 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.