It's difficult for teachers to be both popular( students like them) and effective helping students in learning
As the increasing attention has been paid on education with the prograting development of the society, an controversy has emerged which is weather it’s tough for teachers to be both popular and effective in teaching. Some asset that the nature of teachers is to imparting knowledge, being popular to students doesn’t make sense, while others disrepute that being popular has positive impacts on helping students in learning. Personally speaking, I’ d like to agree with the later with several reasons.
First of all, students’ impression on teachers, which is the reputation of teachers for students, affect students attitudes to study those subjects. And when I say this, I mean that teachers play a significant role in inspiring students’ interests in certain subjects, if a teacher getting along with students well and being popular, it’s undoubtedly that students possess positive and passion to have his class. As an online survey on Sina.com indicates that there are over 75 percent of students don’t learn well on the subjects for they don’t like the teachers, it’s remarkable that if the teacher is popular in groups of students, their effectiveness of imparting knowledge and teaching would spontaneously raise.
Further more, for some national students who seek to receive knowledge as much as possible, their standards to judge the preference of teachers depends on the level of teachers’ teaching, saying that teachers effectiveness of teaching and helping students is the main oblige for teachers, they style of teaching methods, their level of imparting knowledge are the main factors for students to consider, hence it’s common to see a well-known teacher with high level of teaching has positive reputation in groups of students. As the phenomenon that most students are inclined to choose the famous professor with high-level teaching demonstrates that teachers who have high-level of teaching are likely to receive most students’ favourite by all means.
However, I’m not saying that it’s totally easy for teacher to be both popular and effective in teaching, there’s no denying that some teachers with strict style of teaching are to tough to receive students’ inclination, but as students minds grow up gradually, they would totally thanks to the restrict teachers with good teaching, which in turn render the teachers ultimately gain students’ respect and preference.
In a nut shell, as the point I’ve written above, students’ favourite prepared teachers with good effectiveness in teaching as well as high-level teaching of teachers helps teachers to gain respect and favourite, thus it’s literally not difficult for teachers to be both popular and effective in teaching.
- The only reason for people working hard is to earn money To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some students enjoy taking distance learning courses on the computer or television Other students would rather take all of their courses with a teacher in a classroom Which of these options do you think is better 92
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project The group will be helped more by a person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by a person who often strongly insists t 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement University students should not be required to attend classes Instead they should be able to receive credits through a final test or paper Use specific reasons examples to support your answer 52
- Teachers should give primary children aged5 10 assignments less than 30minutes because they have enough instructions in regular school classes Do you agree or disagree 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... prograting development of the society, an controversy has emerged which is weathe...
^^
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'percents'?
Suggestion: percents
...na.com indicates that there are over 75 percent of students don’t learn well on the sub...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...evel of teachers’ teaching, saying that teachers effectiveness of teaching and helping s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 525, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...itive reputation in groups of students. As the phenomenon that most students are i...
^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: TO_TOO[5]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...chers with strict style of teaching are to tough to receive students’ inclination,...
^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'thank'
Suggestion: thank
...s grow up gradually, they would totally thanks to the restrict teachers with good teac...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...gradually, they would totally thanks to the restrict teachers with good teaching, which in t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, while, i mean, in fact, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2322.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46352941176 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86065204172 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458823529412 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.0 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 20.1344086022 209% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 123.602953039 48.9658058833 252% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 232.2 100.406767564 231% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 42.5 20.6045352989 206% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 9.6 5.45110844103 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.518422269238 0.236089414692 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.242133608424 0.076458572812 317% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933689711635 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.346115942639 0.150856017488 229% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049548486787 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.5 11.7677419355 217% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 28.85 58.1214874552 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.7 10.1575268817 194% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.28 10.9000537634 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.0537634409 187% => OK
text_standard: 26.0 10.247311828 254% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.