Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use
specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The stories of the past that constitute the world on a macro level to a single human being on a micro level, help in determining its current state and offers a logical reasoning behind it. Thus, on the foundation of this statement, I express my disagreement with the line thought that, learning from the past has no value in the present.
Firstly, inspiration can be drawn from the epic stories and lessons read in school and put to us in the present. The history taught provides the students with deep insights of various freedom fighters and the struggles that they went through, to achieve a nation that we all live in today. For example, living in India and knowing the independence story, I cannot imagine what it would be like living in that era. In similar context and information was gained through the stories my grandmother told, who was a witness to the entire scenario. The lessons learnt through these stories add value to my life and enrich it. People in that period were principled and stuck by their morals, which questions the lifestyle today. Hence, the knowledge acquired is utilised efficiently in generating a mindful and goal oriented way of life.
Additionally, the political situation of a country is determined by the decisions made by its former rulers in the past. The current topic of discussion in India, has been the elimination of special status offered to Kashmir. The reason for this special status was the result of some agendas that the rulers made during the independence of the country. Therefore, for knowing its vital role today, we ought to know the past behind it. News augmented with its history provides a foresight to what could happen in the future and make better judgements for the same.
To conclude, it is always said that we should learn from the mistakes we made in the past. Thoughts keep mushrooming in our minds, helping us tackle various circumstances, which can sometimes lead into a wrong or an unavoidable situation. It is advisable to imbibe the lessons taught by it and make sure not to repeat them, rather than rescinding from it. To attain an apogee of success, on must work assiduously and not get disheartened from his/her mistakes, they must move ahead, leaving it behind, developing it into an enlightening past for a better future.
- Do you agree or diagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, iuniversities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- role of architecture in nation building 56
- how does writing impact today s world 100
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Do you agree or diagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, iuniversities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8578680203 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67355158348 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558375634518 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3725055212 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27777777778 5.45110844103 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142640761236 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414406555193 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390898472015 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883258002719 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282680434155 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.