learning is better form people who are high-level or form people who are at our own level
Since the beginning of the current century, the concept of learning has become a common trend. People must keep learning along with their whole life, even from books, technology or people around them. Some people believe that they could learn better from their peers and colleagues at work. However, there is a substantial body of evidence claims that learning from superiors is more beneficial. From a personal perspective, learning from high-level individuals, such as teachers or supervisors, is more significant given that they have great experience and knowledge. Below I will strive to explain my supporting points in more details.
The first and foremost point, teachers usually have broad knowledge. Provided that students depend on their educators to get information, they could always gain much more knowledge. Nevertheless, some of our peers could excel in one area, they could not be as proficient as teachers. A vivid example that could be given to shed light on what was stated above is, I remember when I was at high school, I was terrible on physics. Thus, I turned to one of my friends called Christine to tutor me. Even though she was very good at this subject, she could not answer all my questions. On the other hand, when I went to my professor, he not only explained everything to me properly, but also taught me how to solve some mathematics easily. Consequently, asking professionals always has more merits.
Next, coupled with expanding knowledge, the experience is another virtue of learning from superiors. To put it in other words, supervisors or managers are more skillful and more experience in giving instructions; so they could convey information better. For instance, five years ago, when I did my pharmacy internship, my co-worker was adept at using the pharmacy system, but she did not have enough experience how to deal with patients. On the contrary, the manager of the pharmacy was very qualified; hence, he taught me many skills, such as working under stress, multitask and dealing with patients, especially angry ones. As a result, I could add all these skills to my resume and got a better job after graduation.
Taking everything into consideration, without a doubt, learning from those who are higher level is better than learning from those who are on their own level. It is suggested that people compromise and ask for guidance form all well-rounded people.
- How agnostids have lived 76
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. 72
- Easter IslandEaster Island, located in the Pacific Ocean about 4000 miles from the coast of Chile, is one of the most isolated places in the world. It is best known for the Moai, monolithic statues of human figures carved from volcanic rock and located a 81
- the opinions of celebrities are more important to younger people than to the older people? 73
- People who have developed many different kinds of skills are more successful than people who focus on only one skill 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...me people believe that they could learn better from their peers and colleagues at work...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 567, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ny skills, such as working under stress, multitask and dealing with patients, esp...
^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... guidance form all well-rounded people.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for instance, such as, as a result, in other words, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06801007557 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80211501583 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576826196474 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3909988913 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8095238095 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9047619048 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223839566529 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553610942311 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766730743145 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163492440374 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145188514632 0.0645574589148 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.