Many people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat their birds, cats or other animals as members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is clear that entertainment is influential the people's lives. In this modern era, pets are more conventional in comparison to other ones. They can promote the positive spirit of the people. whether I want to mention my opinion about this, it is obvious that these relationship should be logical for people's lives. I absolutely agree that people require such an entertainment but not being their preference. The following reasons and examples are brought in the following to confirm my opinion.
At first, as the pets may influence the people's lives predominantly; It is essential to control the people's behavior towards them. The pets or animals have different habit samples. These habits are not consistent with the human's attitudes and if they're can't be managed, they affect their lives adversely and aggravate their ethic sample attitudes significantly. To exemplify, dogs are too friendly animals but some of their habits seem strange based the human's conventional lives. If the dog walk in the road next to the human, it touch all the ground and convert to a dirty one and the microbes which deposited on its body can transfer to people's home and make them ill. Therefore, since they have been sweet and beautiful, they can disturb the human's health increasingly.
The second one is that if people love their best similar to the other members of the family; their emotional feelings are disturbed gradually. The relationship between the members of the family are differ from pets. For instance, if the father of a family love his cat similar to his wife; As the time passed, his wife maybe disappointed and her sensitive feelings may be damaged and unfortunately the divorce may occur between them as soon as possible. So, the relationship between the people's and their pets must be obey a logical management that it doesn't bring out some adverse impacts on their lives.
According to the above reasons; As a consequence, the relationship and behavioral samples between human and their pets must be manage so carefully. Their habits and also emotional feeling characteristics are too diverse based on their creation and growth. If this management does not accomplished well, the disadvantageous impacts overcome to people's lives and disturb their living attitudes which their lives improvement is too hard and complicated as we think either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-01 | kuouu | 70 | view |
| 2022-05-26 | joyce05 | 80 | view |
| 2021-01-28 | mardanpour | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-28 | atiyesadat | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | thakannv | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whether
...mote the positive spirit of the people. whether I want to mention my opinion about this...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this relationship' or 'these relationships'?
Suggestion: this relationship; these relationships
... opinion about this, it is obvious that these relationship should be logical for peoples lives. I ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the following to confirm my opinion. At first, as the pets may influence the ...
^^^
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...inantly; It is essential to control the peoples behavior towards them. The pets or anim...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...istent with the humans attitudes and if theyre cant be managed, they affect their live...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...with the humans attitudes and if theyre cant be managed, they affect their lives adv...
^^^^
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'touches'?
Suggestion: touches
... walk in the road next to the human, it touch all the ground and convert to a dirty o...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 641, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...h deposited on its body can transfer to peoples home and make them ill. Therefore, sinc...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 747, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...eet and beautiful, they can disturb the humans health increasingly. The second one ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'differed'.
Suggestion: differed
...p between the members of the family are differ from pets. For instance, if the father ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 553, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...st be obey a logical management that it doesnt bring out some adverse impacts on their...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 285, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'accomplish'
Suggestion: accomplish
...and growth. If this management does not accomplished well, the disadvantageous impacts overc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 344, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...the disadvantageous impacts overcome to peoples lives and disturb their living attitude...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1974.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12727272727 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83917134236 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527272727273 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6861296249 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.894736842 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2631578947 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57894736842 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 5.5376344086 235% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32313255347 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101893072305 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593799538663 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199814575316 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222938265047 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.