Many people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat their birds, cats, or other animals as members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Pets, animals that are taken care by people, has been valued and even triggers a heated discussion over if the relationships are good for human. Spending time with these animal, in many people's views, may have bad effect to human. Contrary to these people's opinions is my perspective that they can have positive influence to us, due to the contributions to our mental health, ability to take care of other, and simplicity of their cultivation.
To being with, the pets' accompany can improve our mental health. In detail, when they running around us, sleeping on their bed, or even just stay there can cure most of people's heart that devastated during the work. For example, I spend most of my weekend on the park of a museum. It is not because the spectacle of the building construction, or the peaceful environment of the park. Watching the dog chasing around, although they were not my pets, actually the main purpose why I go there every weekend. Thus, the healing ability of these pets is a good reason that the relationship can have a positive impact to human.
Secondly, people can learn to take care of other when taking care of their pets. To be more specific, treating the pets, in some degree, is like treating human. For example, I have two roomates in my college dormitory, one have a cat, the other not. The one who have a cat in his home always notice the detail when interact with other, while the other seldom care about others feelings. Consequently, with the gain of the social skill, keeping a pet actually do good to human.
Finally, having pets is much more easier that having a human baby. To explain it further, comparing to giving birth to a kid, it is more simple to have a pet. Recently, more and more people decide not to have child, due to the improvement of the technology, people no longer depending their children when they are getting old. In the consequence, they chose to have a pet in their house, they can not only experience the happiness of raising a baby, but also they can avoid the troublesome thing that would happen when have a human baby. Considering the simplicity of having a pet, the relationship is the best choice to people.
In conclusion, the relationship actually have several good influence to people, and we can say that it is worth to everyone to have one!
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-01 | kuouu | 70 | view |
| 2022-05-26 | joyce05 | 80 | view |
| 2021-01-28 | mardanpour | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-28 | atiyesadat | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | thakannv | 85 | view |
- A friend of yours has received some money and plans to use all of it either to go on vacation to buy a car Your friend has asked you for advice Compare your friend s two choices and explain which one you think your friend should choose Use specific reason 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to become financially responsible adults children should learn to manage their own money at a young age Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 77
- Many people have a close relationship with their pets These people treat their birds cats or other animals as members of their family In your opinion are such relationships good Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Films can tell us a lot about the country where they were made What have you learned about a country from watching its movies Use specific examples and details to support your response 60
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: BEING_BEGIN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'begin'?
Suggestion: begin
... simplicity of their cultivation. To being with, the pets accompany can improve ou...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 30, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
... human. Finally, having pets is much more easier that having a human baby. To explain it...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, finally, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66829268293 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55936767176 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507317073171 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.533205717 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282438815738 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868147602243 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465751178255 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165365465368 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402607417771 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: BEING_BEGIN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'begin'?
Suggestion: begin
... simplicity of their cultivation. To being with, the pets accompany can improve ou...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 30, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
... human. Finally, having pets is much more easier that having a human baby. To explain it...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, finally, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66829268293 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55936767176 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507317073171 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.533205717 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282438815738 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868147602243 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465751178255 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165365465368 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402607417771 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.