Modern agriculture does damage the environment, but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment.
Modern agriculture does damage the environment, but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment.
There has been a heated controversy about the effects of human’s recent activity on damaging the environment to provide food for the growing population around the world. A plethora of people have inclined to the idea that damaging the environment for the sake of providing food for population growth is not a good method, while others believe that new population of people need more food to survive and the only way to do so, is damaging the environment. I, myself, subscribe to the former group for quite a few reasons. Two of substantial ones of which are elaborated upon hereunder.
One of the reasons come to my mind at first has to do with the fact that modern agriculture had damaged habitats of many species in forests to grow certain plants or crops to provide food for the growing population. Replacing trees in forests with other plants has caused certain unique species to become extinct. As a result, human has completely manipulated the ecosystem in which due to the loss of some animals, food chains of most animals have been jeopardized to some extent which rely on other extinct animals to survive. The media is full of news on birds and Chitase that have been found dead in forests due to lack of food.
Another equally remarkable point in corroborating my stance for which I have to elaborate is that in this world many countries confront the air pollution crisis which they annually allocate a great deal of money to resolve the global warming problem. Since the urbanization period and population growth, many factories as well as food industries are increasing and flourishing which release toxic chemicals both to the air and waters and contaminate them. Consequently, nowadays new plagues namely cancers and tumors have been introduced to societies in which even state-of-the-art hospitals and skilled doctors are not able to provide people with proper treatments and as a result mortality has been dramatically increased in the last decade.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one realize that damaging the environment for providing food to growing population has caused detrimental effects on health of growing population by adding new maladies to communities. Also, it has destroyed natural forests and shelters of many species that rely on trees.
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. 90
- Modern agriculture does damage the environment but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment 84
- Some people like to record their life by sharing pictures and other information on social-networking sites. Others keep this information to themselves and never share it online. Which do you prefer? 76
- The ability to maintain a small number of friends for a long time is more important to happiness than the ability to make new friends easily. 70
- All university students should take basic science courses regardless of their fields of study. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... population growth is not a good method, while others believe that new population...
^^
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...r extinct animals to survive. The media is full of news on birds and Chitase that ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, so, well, while, as to, in brief, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2068.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15710723192 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8920714614 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528678304239 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.6088661145 48.9658058833 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.714285714 100.406767564 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6428571429 20.6045352989 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430684675286 0.236089414692 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157225603938 0.076458572812 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.255040808895 0.0737576698707 346% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.342639060168 0.150856017488 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.341912611856 0.0645574589148 530% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 11.7677419355 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.24 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 10.002688172 210% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.