Modern agriculture methods damage the environment, but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment.
Environmental and food quality are two important issues that people keep focusing on, nowadays a new discussion over whether using harmful agricultural ways to provide food or protect the land is more significant. In my opinion, I believe the guaranteeing that the environment is in a balanced state is more vital because without it, people’s food quality would be decreased more seriously.
Firstly, polluted soil could make crops toxic for people, which could threat their lives. Misusing pesticides is one of the most harmful agricultural pollution, with the development of various of pesticides, farmers blindly used amount of them to kill worms, which could lead to the contamination to soils beneath their farmlands. According to the newest record from the Peking University, because of the misusing of various of pesticides, soils beneath most of farmlands contain five times chemical heavy metal elements that cannot be digested by humans more than they should. From the report we can conclude that if we let go agricultural contamination, there would be no safeguards for people’s meals, and those toxic elements could make people be sick and even threats to their lives. There are many examples in arid places where arable soils are much less than other places. With the irrigation of pesticides, those soils always contain even more toxic elements which could be transferred to crops. So people living on there tend to lost their hairs and may be dizzy if they eat too much.
Meanwhile, contaminated soil can reduce the fertility of lands, people will not have enough food. Another serious pollution is due to over-planting. People’s population has been increasing for many years, and to satisfy the demands of food for more people, farmers do not obey natural conventions, instead, they increase their frequency of harvest and choose farmlands randomly as long as seeds can survive. Such behaviors exhaust arable soils and beneath water near farming places, more and more farms’ production is declining, so if people refuse to think for their future, there would be no fertile places anymore, and their food would not be enough. For example, in many developing countries, people regarded food as the most vital resource, so they blindly planted crops all over their country. As people finally realized their farmlands could not feed them anymore, they could only import food and their developments were paused.
In conclusion, preventing the environment from agricultural pollution is more important because it ensures the both the safety of people’s food and the production of farmer’s crops in the long run.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 88
- Comprehensive 3
- Modern agriculture methods damage the environment but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment 40
- Do you agree or disagree Most people think that some important problems can be solved by themselves or by thier families and thus it is almost not necessary to refer to the government 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily Use specific reasons and ex 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 455, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the farmlands') or simply say ''most farmlands''.
Suggestion: most of the farmlands; most farmlands
...of various of pesticides, soils beneath most of farmlands contain five times chemical heavy metal...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, may, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26183844011 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67368555366 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537604456825 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.204657093 48.9658058833 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.928571429 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6428571429 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138113523561 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516748979936 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475239137555 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1233493217 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544574636147 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.