Most citizens have the right to vote. What do you believe is the type of background best suited for someone who will become a national leader?
A. business background
B. legal background
C. military background
To be a head of government is a difficult job, and the leader should have a relevant background. The potential future president or prime minister could have business experience and run the nation with the same rules as in a business or a military background because the head of the country is also a commander-in-chief. However, I am confident that the best type of knowledge for a national leader should be a legal background because when the leader runs a country, it is the time about justice, people rights, and equality under the law.
Indeed, the legal background and education at law school is the most popular option for many presidents. For example, the largest number of the United States' presidents have legal experience, relevant education, and oftentimes law degree. Moreover, a lot of presidents were graduated from top-rated law universities, such as Columbia Law School, Harvard Law school, and Yale Law School. Why is this instance important? The answer is plain to see: law's core competencies are essential skills and knowledge for all leaders.
While citizens discussed the best-suited experience for the national leader, three presidents in the US for the last 25 years has a legal background (Bill Clinton, Barak Obama, and Joe Biden). Furthermore, it would be unwise to deny that they are not eminent leaders. For instance, Barak Obama took a job as a community organizer in Chicago and worked with low-income residents, which he later called the experience “the best education I ever got, better than anything I got at Harvard Law School”.
Clearly, a legal background is also about the integration of different perspectives into solutions. Along with that, the striking example is a reform of the healthcare sector in the US for the last 70 years, which provided us with information that the presidents with legal backgrounds impact a significant contribution to this issue. Two former presidents in the US with the legal experience provided a tremendous impact on healthcare. They were Lyndon Johnson, who created Medicaid and Medicare programs for the poor and senior people, and Barak Obama, who established the Affordable Care Act (ACA), in common terms “Obamacare.” Whether the president has judicial experience, he thinks about all grassroots level, especially about a deprived, elderly, and vulnerable group of people.
In the final analysis, it appears that legal background is the most suitable option for citizens who have right to vote for the national leader. So, we could find many advantages of this chose, such as excellent education at famous law school, significant impact to people’s equality under the law, and equal access to healthcare.
- The passage and the lecture is about originality of Jane Austens full length portrait The author of the article shows 3 evidence of it but the speaker convinces that they can be hardly proved 76
- Both the reading and the lecture discuss the decline of literature and its consequences While the reading mentions only shortcomings of this phenomenon the lecturer looks on the bright side 80
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time Which of these situations do you think is better 67
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 60
- Most citizens have the right to vote What do you believe is the type of background best suited for someone who will become a national leader A business background B legal background C military background 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2260.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20737327189 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9843113032 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527649769585 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 698.4 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.2464134955 48.9658058833 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.941176471 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5294117647 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41176470588 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307495124482 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113787922128 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11883885793 0.0737576698707 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187366222601 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07831362909 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.