Movies and television programs have more negative effect than positive effect on the way young people behave.
Watching movies and television programs is conducive to soothing our minds for people to relax in this mobile internet time, especially people are now under heavy pressure. However, recently there arouse a heated argument on whether watching movies or television programs is overwhelm beneficial for young people. Many claims that it’s waste of time for the young, while others hold that there are not disadvantages for young people spending time on TVs and movies. To me, I am inclined to the former one, My point of view will be illustrated comprehensively through following reasons.
To start with, movies, I strongly believe, are a terrific outlet for young people to release their pressures. According to a famous theory advanced in the twentieth century, humans have a gift for fantasy, through which we seek to reshape our realities in to more satisfying forms than those encountered in our daily life. The fantasy permits us to objectify our anxieties, worries, and pain, confront them, and fulfill their best wishes in a movie or a television program if no fact. Thus, movies and television programs are regarded as tools for us to escape the unpleasant realities for a while.
Secondly, movies and TV programs are directly beneficial to young people. For example, by appreciating documentaries young people are subconsciously learning new things and broadening their visions. To be specific, the Big Short explains extensively about the 2008 economic crisis, therefore reducing the possibility of young people being duped by financial traps made by the wall street.
It’s worth noting that the negative effects of watching movies and TV programs are not ignorable. For people at young ages, they might not have well-developed self-control capabilities and are prone to be addictive to these shows and movies. Furthermore, now most TV shows and movies are produced in series, which seduce young people to keep following up, who then spend much time on them rather than devote themselves into study and career. But as they grow up, with more mature personalities, they are able to overcome these limitations.
To sum up, in term of young people, I am of belief that the positive effects of watching movies and television programs outweigh it’s negative sides. It has been well elaborated by the reasons and examples I discussed above.
- salvage logging 71
- Amtrak is an intercity train service currently owned by the United States government There are a number of critics who believe that the government should not own Amtrak and that Amtrak should be sold to a privately owned company These critics put forward 90
- salvage logging 68
- Spartacus the rebel leader who fought against the Romans with an army of fellow escaped slaves is one of the most famous figures in ancient Roman history Spartacus led his men against their Roman oppressors and managed to defeat the Roman army in several 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost Use specific reasons and examples 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'overwhelmed'.
Suggestion: overwhelmed
...tching movies or television programs is overwhelm beneficial for young people. Many claim...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inancial traps made by the wall street. It’s worth noting that the negative effe...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for example, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1983.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21842105263 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82464789559 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576315789474 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1709151271 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.647058824 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3529411765 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351851583181 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110580057165 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851184550737 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197487207657 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494769686191 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.