Nobody can deny the fact and the truth that the neighborhood plays a vitally important role in every person’s life, and it is considered quite critical and crucial. Moreover, it is a worldwide known that neighborhood is a key factor that formulates the lifespan of all human beings. Based on all the conducted statistics, studies, and researcher, one may quota that what are the good characters of the neighbor. Actually, heading out of all my own experience and observation, I am totally convinced that there are two important characters of our neighbor.
First, supportive neighbors in our community are a desirable character because they help us when an emergency thing occurs. People living close to us are the only one who can provide us essential assistance. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Five years ago, we suffered extreme emotional trauma when we lost many personal belongings in our house fire in the middle night. Our neighbor who called quickly the fire department and provided us food to eat and a place to stay reduced the emotional damage. This example demonstrates how important it is to have a supportive neighbor.
Secondly, friendly neighbors in our neighborhood are a valuable character because they are willing to lend a hand. A small example may give the light of this point. For instance, three years ago, I was living with my wife and two kids in an apartment in NC. My wife was at work, and I was home taking care of the children. Suddenly, my boss called me to drive across the city to meet someone. I panicked at first because I knew I could not leave my kids at home alone. However, I called our next-door neighbor and asked if she could stay with the children. Furthermore, I was able to meet the man because of a friendly neighbor.
Heading out of all the previously mentioned discussions, I can sum up and conclude that the two important characters of neighbors are supportive and friendly characters because neighbors help in an emergency situation and due to the fact that they are willing to lend a hand.
- TOEFL T P O 22 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- tpo 45 fossilized structures could resemble a bee nests 3
- Do you agree or disagree with this following statement? A four-day workweek benefits than a five-day workweek.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible. First, atmospheric 73
- TOEFL T P O 47 - Integrated Writing Task 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...key factor that formulates the lifespan all of the human beings. Based on all the conducte...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 331, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'belongings'.
Suggestion: belongings
...reme emotional trauma when we lost many personal belongings in our house fire in the middle night. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t that they are willing to lend a hand.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80952380952 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86474793857 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495798319328 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 542.7 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1199230965 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3684210526 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7894736842 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17887410268 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591514216308 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525886378005 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108609677917 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480055843798 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.