Now children do not behave as well as the children did in the past. Which one of the following measures do you think can help children (age 5~10) behave better?
A. Control the time they spend on TV or movie
B. Take more time to chat with children
C. Monitor the interaction between children and their peers
In the contemporary world, children's behavior has altered and it has declined compared to the past. This was affected by so many reasons which is not the subject to talk about. However, it is controversial among people that what way they should take to lead their children towards a better attitude. Some people might believe that it is helpful to take more time to chat with children or monitor their interaction with their peers. Nevertheless, I believe that the best way is controlling the time that children spend watching TV. I will elaborate on my perspective in the following paragraphs.
First, in today's world, due to the hectic lifestyle, parents have less time to spend with children and allow them to watch TV. Therefore, they do not learn how to be socialized and they are absorbed by the fantasized, unrealistic world of TV programs and cartoons. In psychology, it has been proven the best age for children to learn new things is normally the age between 4 to 12. So, if children spend more time on TV they will never learn life skills like finding friends, communication, being responsible for their chores, play with their peers, etc. Hence, when they grow up they will face lots of predicaments in real life and they suffer from a lack of ability to solve problems.
The second and equally important reason is, watching TV has negative effects on children's behavior. Their innocent mind is not capable to discriminate what is good to learn and what is not. They have a flexible personality and absorb all the information like a sponge. So, if they watch horror movies or violent movies, or even cartoons, it directly affects their behavior and causes them to have disruptive personalities. To illustrate vividly, my younger brother, during his young ages was allowed to watch TV programs without having a boundary. Later he started to speak out loud or throwing things or being troublesome which he learned from TV. So, if he was controlled to watch TV, he would not have had disruptive behavior and being challenged.
In conclusion, In my opinion, parents must control their children for watching TV and teach them to play with their peers, how to communicate, and real-life skills to prepare them for the future and educate a healthy personality for society.
- Now children do not behave as well as the children did in the past Which one of the following measures do you think can help children age 5 10 behave better A Control the time they spend on TV or movie B Take more time to chat with children C Monitor the 76
- It s better to have rules about the type of clothing that people wear at schools or in their workplace 73
- Is it as important for older people to learn and study new things as it is for young people 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Advertising is the most important cause of unhealthy eating habits 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1902.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91472868217 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74558230536 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529715762274 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.097505783 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.105263158 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3684210526 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300559463342 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979799610918 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782034935206 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19301703048 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111074803653 0.0645574589148 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.