Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Food is one of the most important basic need of our life. Since, the invention of fire, human started to eat cooked food for their nutrients, and the processes of making food are changing from generation to generation. However, this changing step is more dynamic for the recent year and this enhances our way of life. It seems to me that our living status is influenced by our cooking ways. I feel this way for two most important reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, people now spent less time to cook their food and this enables them to use their spare time for earning. If you looked back to 90s, you would find that most of the woman of developing the country as well as the developed country spent their most of the time for making food for the family. But, nowadays, even though they prepare food for the family member, as they save their time, they can do other activity like teaching, working at the national or international company, and involving to develop new technology. As a result, these changes help our economy as well. My mother experience is a compelling example of it. I remember, when I was at the village in my early life, I had seen my mother hard work for preparing our meal. She had to collect woods, bamboos, or tree leaves and burn them for energy. All of those tasks required my mother whole day. On the other hand, recently our villager have got the gas connection and that makes everything easier. Now, my mother can teach Arabic to children in the evening which is her free time. My mother example properly shows how one technology changes her life.
Secondly, a new method for cooking is healthier than before. Last century people had to work the whole day to manage their meal and they had to burn organic material for getting energy. Conversely, nowadays people use natural gasses which do not emit smoke at all. For an instant, I have never seen any smoke since I started to live in the capital city Dhaka. In my apartment, we use natural gas for our cooking energy, so this way of preparing food is healthier. On the other hand, I remember my mother condition after making the meal for us - her whole face covered with smoky ashes and that made her sick. I feel sorry for my mom because for her hardship for us.
In sum up, it is clear that our ways of living enhance by using new technology for managing our meal. This is because it helps us to save our time and use the other important activities and because these ways are really good for our health relative to past processes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-30 | Pandalove | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-20 | prayashpathak | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-03 | Emn96 | 70 | view |
| 2019-07-07 | mike.sharko | 66 | view |
| 2019-04-23 | khosrow nouroozi | 70 | view |
- Tpo33 71
- TPO 29-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 70
- TPO 40 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 70
- Do you agree or disagree that “ Poor people have more difficult lives than rich people have" ? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, well, as for, i feel, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 73.0 43.0788530466 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2094.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51293103448 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29909471595 2.67179642975 86% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519396551724 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5043818067 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.76 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.56 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143817905752 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482564070005 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421051949418 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105394528834 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268961617563 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.