TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
There are many teachers who like to assign projects for individual students, yet some teacher asks to complete group works. Both of the ways have some positive and negative aspects that should be considered before asking student to do that task. Even though group works have some advantages for students, I think it is better for a student doing work alone. I feel this way for several reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, group workers become less efficient in completing their assignment. Since all students are not like to work hard and learn more, a group assignment is not helpful for the student who wants to learn more. If you have to work with others, you need to spend more time as all students will not come in time to the meeting or just waste time by playing video games and gossiping. Furthermore, as only one or two people from a group work hard and the project is big work, they are not able to do any research for that projects. My own experience is a compelling example of this. I remember when I was at university, one of my English teacher assigned us a group presentation. What needed to complete the task did not know most of the members of the group. As a result, only two of us had to work hard to shape the presentration, and we were working day and night to finish the task. As we were so busy with the basic element, we did not have any time for research. Consequently, the final grade was very bad and we did not learn as my teacher desired.
On the other hand, work individually able student to learn more. A people who work alone gets more time for doing that activity as it's most of the timeless work than a group assignment. The more time one gets to do one work, the more be able to research it. For instance, when I worked with my professor, who helped us to learn about the geographical condition of Bangladesh, usually asked us to complete a term paper. I worked adequately and finished the task before the deadline. As I had some extra time, I did some research, and that helped me to learn many new things about Dhaka condition. Then I revised my work several times which made my job perfect. As a result, I got a good result in the example, which would not be possible if I worked with others.
From the discussion, it is clear that it is not good for all students, mainly who want to learn more deeply about something, to ask to complete a group project. This is because people waste their time when working with other by gossiping and playing which creates a pressure to those who work hard to complete the task and because if anyone work by himself/ herself can do better work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-24 | zabanfinish | 3 | view |
| 2018-08-20 | zabanfinish | 70 | view |
| 2018-08-20 | zabanfinish | 66 | view |
- TPO-28 Integrated WritingRobert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him into an 80
- Integrated writing TPO 19 82
- Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 70
- TPO-41Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, then, for instance, i feel, i think, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2171.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 490.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4306122449 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43938682459 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455102040816 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9811736926 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4583333333 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335698453743 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104210485957 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657591866076 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230237339146 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275897030651 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.