Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups, and all members of the group receive the same grade (mark) on the project. Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate students?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples.
Working in groups and teams is an essential factor in life. No matter what organization or company we join, we need to work in teams at one point. Therefore, there has been extensive debate about whether it is more efficient to evaluate students on their work separately or as a whole. I believe professors must assign students grades based on each individual's contribution.
First, one or two people are often exhausted after a group project. There are many cases where groupmates rely on only one or two members to complete and present the assignments. Yet, they gain the same score as the ones who did most, if not all, of the project, which leads to the exhaustion of a small number of members while others enjoy a free ride to a good grade. For example, in my last year of university, we had a group project for technical languages class. All my teammates other than one announced that they couldn't help much because their English was not good. I and my other groupmate did all the work, even making the PowerPoint slides. After finishing this assignment, I was exhausted, which led me to fall behind on some other tasks. Therefore, I believe that when groupmates are graded together, much of the responsibility may fall on one person's shoulder. At the same time, there would be no tangible awards for their hard work other than exhaustion.
Second, responsibility is an important factor in our life. In society, it is essential to take care of our assignments because, in the workplace, we are evaluated based on individual results, even when working as a team. Grading group assignments by considering each individual's contribution allows schools to train students for future responsibilities. For example, A friend of mine always relied on her group mates to earn a good grade. After graduation, she started working as an intern in a big company. She and the other interns were given a project to work on as a team. Due to competition between coworkers, nobody covered for her. The group leader revealed to the department chief that she had minimal participation in the assignment. Hence, she wasn't hired and had to look for a new job after her internship finished. Based on this experience, I believe that if grades were assigned individually, she would have been used to working effectively in a group and handling her responsibilities. Consequently, she could have gotten hired.
In conclusion, I believe grades need to be assigned individually based on each person's contributions. Not only does this allow students to understand how to take responsibility it makes it easier for some students to work as a team without getting exhausted.
- The golden frog is a small bright yellow amphibian that lives in and around mountain streams in Panama The species is severely endangered because of a fungus that infects the frog through its skin and inhibits the frog s critical life functions such as br 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is often viewed as a bad quality for a person to have but in fact it is a good quality for a person to have Use specific reasons and examples to suppo
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 71
- Although the sale of rhinoceros horns is illegal worldwide rhinoceroses Rhinos are commonly poached hunted illegally for their horns which can be sold for tens of thousands of dollars per kilogram Rhino horns are so valuable that one type of rhino is alre 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost Use specific reasons and examples 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...st assign students grades based on each individuals contribution. First, one or two people...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 296, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...oject, which leads to the exhaustion of a small number of members while others enjoy a free ride ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 520, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ates other than one announced that they couldnt help much because their English was not...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...g group assignments by considering each individuals contribution allows schools to train st...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 754, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...icipation in the assignment. Hence, she wasnt hired and had to look for a new job aft...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, if, look, may, second, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2205.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.921875 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98928434753 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529017857143 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3064432781 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8076923077 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2307692308 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88709677419 286% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248010535618 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668233435622 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551078324099 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139761506633 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490498523723 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.