Nowadays people are more willing to help the people who they don t know For example giving food and clothes to the people who need them than they were in the past.
"Sharing", is one of the most famous topics in the modern society. We have shared bikes, shared cars, shared books and lots of things that people use in a sharing way. As for whether people nowadays are more willing to help people whom they don't know than in the past or not, I prefer the former.
The persistent increase of people's living quality makes it happens. In the past, especially in the developing countries, the average living quality at that time was not as same as that in today’s life. People worked hard but had low salaries, which was just suitable to support their families' daily survival. In this condition, most people didn't have the ability to help others. However, in today's society, unlike in the past, people earn much more money so that they can have more choices to do and extra money that they can dominate freely. As a result, people now are more likely to help others whom they don't know.
The changes of social values may also be one of the reasons that why this happens. In the past, people were more likely to pursue their own benefits. However, in recent years, society gradually prefers people to have universal love, which means we should help others more without asking for rewards. Nowadays, lots of institutions and charity organization set up activities to raise funds to help people in need. There are also companies such as GoodWill, collecting old clothes and other items donated by people and give these old things or sell them in very low price to people who are in need. Hence, due to the changes of social universal value, people now are more willing to help others.
Overall, I believe this is an impressing phenomenon and change to human society. People are gradually becoming kind to others than before. Materials prosperity and social values changes play important roles in it.
- Do you agree or disagree People nowadays are more willing to help other people giving food or clothing than in the past 78
- Nowadays people are more willing to help the people who they don t know For example giving food and clothes to the people who need them than they were in the past 70
- Many things can influence the academic achievement and emotional growth of a student In this regard beers have more of an impact that teachers do To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 76
- Nowadays people are more willing to help the people who they don t know For example giving food and clothes to the people who need them than they were in the past 76
- Nowadays people are more willing to help the people who they don t know For example giving food and clothes to the people who need them than they were in the past 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a sharing way" with adverb for "sharing"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ooks and lots of things that people use in a sharing way. As for whether people nowadays are mor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e more willing to help people whom they dont know than in the past or not, I prefer ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...urvival. In this condition, most people didnt have the ability to help others. Howeve...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 609, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...re more likely to help others whom they dont know. The changes of social values m...
^^^^
Line 5, column 23, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: You should probably use 'value'.
Suggestion: value
...hey dont know. The changes of social values may also be one of the reasons that why...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, so, as for, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 317.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83596214511 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44062532394 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552050473186 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8251928738 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1666666667 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6111111111 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467360922917 0.236089414692 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136084166332 0.076458572812 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120992297014 0.0737576698707 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252389555517 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106580964117 0.0645574589148 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.