numbers of cars will reduce after twenty years
The twenty-first century is the most interesting kind of all human kind's history. There will be more technological advancement after twenty years. People will be more talented and have more perspective. Although some may think that the numbers of cars will increase in the future, I am of the opinion that people will be less likely to use cars in the future. I feel this way because of the following reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, the advancement in technology produces a new way to travel to long distances as well as short distances to eliminate the increasing traffic and possible causes of accidents. The government is trying to develop public transportation which is faster and comfortable for the customer. For instance, in my town, the project of the metro train has been developing. It joins the whole city together since people can travel through the metro train by their stations. This will be beneficial for the working people who have to travel daily for their work in the same city. People appreciate this project and they are very enthusiastic about traveling.
The second and the same exquisite proof for this assertion is people will start to understand the situation of global warming and try to avoid usage of transportation which may spread pollution in the environment. The scientists are trying to make an efficient solar car. Thus, they already had tried to make it, but it is not as proficient as regular cars. In the future, the scientist may become successful to launch this invention and people will less likely to use petrol cars.
Finally, in the recent era, due to inflation people do not prefer to use their car since the price of petrol and diesel are skyscraping. People have started to use alternative options like by train or other public transportation. For example, in my city, there is the facility of the BRTS bus service which joins each area of the city. People like to use it because it is very comfortable with great frequency in the city, cheaper than the car, and very comfortable. So, in this way, they can save money, and as a result according to the government of my city, traffic has been reduced compared to the past time.
In conclusion, people want to use cheaper as well as essay way to transportation. So the number of cars will reduce in the future.
- y topics:Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wait until the class or mee 63
- do you agree or disagree that it is important to know about surrounding events whether it is not affected to your routine life. 60
- various reasons to attend university 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement. movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave.use specific reasons and examples. 60
- salinity in lake possible solution and argues 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kinds'' or 'kind's'?
Suggestion: kinds'; kind's
... the most interesting kind of all human kinds history. There will be more technologic...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 603, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...raffic has been reduced compared to the past time. In conclusion, people want to use c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 43, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... conclusion, people want to use cheaper as well as essay way to transportation. So...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, may, second, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1960.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8275862069 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72659987273 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492610837438 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 609.3 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3688308427 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0909090909 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205033805165 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674322120635 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107392769904 0.0737576698707 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138092317954 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109010055645 0.0645574589148 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.