One could learn a lot about a person from the type of friends the person has.
Friends play a pivotal role in everyone's life. We can affect our friends easily and be influenced by our friends sometimes. People possess different opinions on whether one could learn about a person from the type of friends the person has. From my perspective, the kinds of friends a person has can reflect what type of person he is, because they have the same personality and interests.
First and foremost, it is obvious that friends share the same characteristic. In such a hectic life, people need someone who can understand their feelings to mitigate their pains and bad moods. So in this condition, friendships begin to burgeon. To elucidate, take my own experience. When I was in college, I was an introversive student. I did not incline to join associations and parties, so that I felt lonely all the time. Then I met some introverts who can understand my pain of being isolated. Therefore, we became close to each other after we shared our thoughts and the feeling of being isolated. To be more specific, we became friends as we have the same characteristic.
Secondly, it is safe to say that friends have the same interests. In many cases, people become to be buddies after they find out they love the same sport or instrument. Thus, they will have more common topics. For instance, I was a fanatic basketball fan when I studied in high school. But almost none of my classmates like playing basketball. One day when I was training alone on the playground, I met Barry who was also enthusiastic about basketball. We had a lot of common topics like NBA matches, our favorite players etc. As a result, we became good friends since we share the same hobbies.
Admittedly, it can be said that all of friendships are not related to our internal needs. Sometimes humans approach others to obtain an external purpose like mutual benefits. However, most of people tend to make friends who have the same tastes and value, so we can learn about a person by knowing his friends.
To conclude, it might be true that one cannot learn all parts of a person through his friends. However, there is sufficient evidence to prove that one is able to learn a lot about someone from the type of friends this person has.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-18 | amir_gha67 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | Christine hanna | 90 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | DDDDDD | 70 | view |
| 2018-09-02 | DAISY CHANG | 77 | view |
| 2017-11-23 | saray denizi | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity and interests. First and foremost, it is obvious that friends share the sam...
^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
... purpose like mutual benefits. However, most of people tend to make friends who have the same ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, as a result, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71391752577 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69114993432 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520618556701 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1015361843 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.3461538462 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9230769231 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359419026163 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092975200391 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172474497639 0.0737576698707 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259912887097 0.150856017488 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.229547931782 0.0645574589148 356% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 11.7677419355 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.