At one high school, more of its students have been caught cheating on their homework assignments than ever before. The school is considering making a change to help decrease the number of students who cheat on homework. Which ONE of the following actions do you think will be most effective, and why? Asking parents to monitor their children as they do their homework and confirm that their children have not cheated; Increasing the penalty (punishment) for cheating; Asking teachers to create homework assignments that will make it more difficult for students to cheat.
Various kinds of school assignments are created to evaluate the academic performance of students. But sometimes students try to copy their peers' work to gain good marks. In this regard, some people think that students should be penalized or assigned more difficult works. On the other hand, some people contend that parents should be asked to monitor them and make them understand their fault. Well, personally, I would concur with the latter opinion, that students should be made to realize by their parents since parents can be their best guides. I think this is the best option due to two major reasons and examples that will substantiate my stance.
First, parents can supervise their students in the best way because children spend most of their time with their parents at home. As a result, parents can keep an eye on them while they are completing their homework. Students are more attached to their parents and obey them the most. Hence, parents can first make them realize their mistake and then motivate them to work hard. They can explain to them in a better way, either emotionally or through their past experiences, the importance of working hard.
Second, school-going students are not mature enough to value money, as they are fully dependent on their parents for all their expenses. Even if they are penalized, they wouldn’t be much affected. Consequently, they will not find themselves as guilty or feel like doing something wrong. My past experience at school is a good case in point. Few students in our class were caught cheating, so they were charged with a heavy fine. But, in spite of this they were very happy that they got away with this situation so easily and didn’t regret at all.
In conclusion, I would reaffirm my point that if students are found cheating, then their parents should be informed and asked to help their children realize their mistake. This is because the parents are the closest to their children and know them the best, and also because children are too young to be penalized or work harder. Therefore, due to the aforementioned reasons, the decision to allow parents to handle this matter is the right one.
- If you have extra money are you happier giving it to charity or spending it yourself 70
- Development in technology can led people to enjoy longer lives 80
- Ethanol as an alternative to petroleum 76
- Whether government should fubd public transports or improve the condition of roads 70
- It is sometimes better to hide truth or always remain honest 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 457, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...ay, either emotionally or through their past experiences, the importance of working hard. Secon...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
... or feel like doing something wrong. My past experience at school is a good case in point. Few ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 238, Rule ID: KNOW_NOW[4]
Message: Did you mean 'now'?
Suggestion: now
...s are the closest to their children and know them the best, and also because childre...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, second, so, then, therefore, well, while, i think, in conclusion, as a result, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1799.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88858695652 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45720550074 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516304347826 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9175108679 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.95 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165702537479 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601127809175 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387323015769 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104568319627 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0120658019885 0.0645574589148 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.