One of the most challenge problems in modern society is to have the most up-to-date skills for workplace. For solving this, government decides to give all adults over the age of 25 a training course to learn new skills. Do you think it is an effective way for government to spend its money?
Some governments deal with the obstacles of modern society. While some governments find out the tactics to train all adults by practical course to learn new skills, others follow alternative ideas. It is so controvertible for governments to decide a specific solution. In my view, they should pick up the method to give people over the age of 25 opportunities to take a course in order to cultivate new skills. They can easily acquire profound knowledge from practical training, exploit this experience as soon as possible, and create a better workplace instead of taking a training course.
To begin with, people over the age of 25 are easy to obtain wisdom in-depth through courses created by their government. They are not children and students in the university, so they live an independent life on a daily basis. Therefore, they hold their own determination without helping their parents and friends The decision by themselves creates proficient motivation to cope with the courses they have to take to gain up-to-date skills for the workplace. Consequently, governments should invest their expense in establishing the classes in order to create modern skills.
Secondly, constructing the classes for people’s practical abilities boost the speed to figure out the modern problems in society. Some governments are related to entrepreneurs running their own business and prominent workers at exceptional developed companies. Hence, people who take practical courses spontaneously absorb ample knowledge from a successful person and person who equip with higher leadership. They will brush up on the quality of their workplace as soon as possible shortly after they take the courses.
Finally, the useful courses to solve modern problems provide people with situations where they do not need to take these lectures anymore. After people are trained by sophisticated teachers, they remind the classes about how they tackle their problems in their company. They would make use of these lectures to train their colleagues as well. Furthermore, their government does not utilize a huge amount of money to develop the skills related to the workplace because the employees teach other workers all strategies they learned in the plans by their governments.
To sum up, the government should plan to consume its investment in developed skills with practical courses for people over the age of 25. I surely believe that they change the habit in the company rudimentary, increase the speed to detect the problems in the company, create a situation where the government will not invest in the plan in the future.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students do not respect their teachers as much as they did in the past 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is easier for people to maintain good health than before 73
- Do you agree or disagree It is better to relax by watching a movie or reading a book than doing exercise 66
- Which of the following do you think is the best way for a student to make new friends join a sports team participating volunteer activities in a community traveling 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children rely too much on the technology like computers smart phones video games for fun and entertainment Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children s developmen 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, in my view, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2202.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29326923077 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84410252871 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521634615385 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4276161967 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.894736842 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8947368421 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78947368421 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234044378335 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807243334446 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055583740535 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145897934598 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526581715954 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.