In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age.
There are numerous lessons that ought to be taught to children at young ages. From teaching them how to behave morally toward the elderly, to simply, how to sit on a dinner table. Some people believe that it is important for their children to become financially responsible; however, others think that this issue is not of the essence. Hence, they financially support their children as much as they can. As far as I am concerned, I adopt a firm position with the former idea. I believe that children ought to learn how to manage their pocket money in order to become responsible. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
To commence with, the positive impacts this lesson has on children’s traits should be regarded as the highest priority since it can teach them numerous things. A vivid example can be given to shed light on what was elaborated above. A cousin of mine, age 19, lives in Berlin, Germany. His parents have given all they had to make their child happy due to the reason that they believe a child without sufficient money in the society can be susceptible to superficial aspects of life??. He has not yet learned how to be responsible for his actions because his parents were always supporting him, either financially or emotionally. Not to mention the mere fact that he will not be capable of living alone in the fore-seeing/upcoming future. To elucidate on, teaching children this issue may not suit their interest, but in fact will not blemish their personality and characteristics. It figures that, the more parents spare their children with abundant pocket money, the more the children are drawn in a real imaginary life which will not be of aid.
In addition to the stated reason, children come to realize how hard it is to make a living, this issue can substantiate the justifiability of my claim. A refreshingly remarkable statistics, unveiled by a study, conducted by a number of sociologists in Johns Hopkins University, indicated that children with a limited pocket money, have more chance to take control of their lives individually when they become financially independent. As a result, children learn how to cut the corners, spend wisely. To delineate, this way of treating children, will inevitably encourage them to stand on their own feet, even at a young age/from the very beginning of their childhood. Simply put, children think up of new ways to be grateful toward their parents and caretakers.
By way of conclusion, based on the aforementioned arguments, I am of the opinion that taking this issue serious is of paramount importance due to the positive impacts it has on children’s lives and the fact about how hard it is to make a living. As a result, parents should take a closer look to their children’s lives and try not to neither spoil nor spare their children.
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College."To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current 50
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, at 58
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal."A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situ 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 62
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'in addition', 'in fact', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.20652173913 0.229887763892 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.152173913043 0.158761421928 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0815217391304 0.0866891130778 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0561594202899 0.046263068375 121% => OK
Pronouns: 0.070652173913 0.0685040099705 103% => OK
Prepositions: 0.115942028986 0.118717715034 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0326086956522 0.0351676179071 93% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.95071645558 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0525362318841 0.0309702414327 170% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0851449275362 0.0887237588012 96% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0271739130435 0.0209618222197 130% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0199275362319 0.0139019557991 143% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2865.0 2387.08602151 120% => OK
No of words: 485.0 408.028673835 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90721649485 5.86048508987 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.48200974243 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.338144329897 0.338922669872 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.261855670103 0.251872472559 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.173195876289 0.174417080927 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.105154639175 0.112833075102 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95071645558 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505154639175 0.524397521467 96% => OK
Word variations: 59.0407693586 59.2087087015 100% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6684587814 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0454545455 20.5533526081 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2615891654 48.84282405 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.227272727 120.699889404 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0454545455 20.5533526081 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.454545454545 0.644075263715 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 48.2310215558 45.7405998639 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.27272727273 1.45489161554 87% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392443441134 0.300154397459 131% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0861687272723 0.103427244359 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0562555071918 0.0752933317313 75% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.467559637147 0.497263757937 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.148677979979 0.151897553556 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15159204824 0.114077575197 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109828790405 0.0781384742642 141% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.511020449325 0.336927656856 152% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0158990474203 0.067059652881 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289827792233 0.210909579961 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.09154738014 0.0618886996521 148% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8870967742 109% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.42114695341 107% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.