In the past, it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure and successful future.
People are always eager to put their energy and intelligence into their career to achieve a bright future. However, it is not a easy course for people to get a secure and successful future. Someone might consider that it was easier to find out the career which lead to such wonderful future, while others hold an opposite opinion. From my perspective, I firmly disagree with the former statement.
To begin with, there are numerous people who were unable to determine both the secure and successful future. They might had strong beliefs towards their careers, but they failed to maintain their own lives. Socrates, who was a classical Greek philosopher, is a concrete example. He created a new criterion for western philosophy, and bravely implemented and broadcasted his own thoughts, nevertheless, he sacrificed his precious life in order to chase for his career. This case from Socrates well illustrates that in the past, it is sometimes very hard for people to make the precise career choice which would lead to a secure and successful future.
Besides, today's people might make job choices which are suitable for them to strive for. To state it more clearly, there are countless vocational guiding groups in the universities with the aim of helping students to find out the most suitable jobs. With such elaborate and comprehensive judgement of students' personalities, skills and hobbies, it is easier for students to identify the most suitable jobs which will lead to a bright future. Take my own experience as an example. When I was a senior student in university, one of my professors recommande me with the vocatinal guiding groups on campus. After being interviewed by the guiders, he gave me several job type suggestions which proved working pretty well on me when I followed such suggestions to find a job. Thus, with the help from experienced stuffs, students can easily get the right orientation of the job type which will lead them to a bright future.
In a nutshell, I believe it is not easy to identify the type of career which will lead to a secure and successful future in the past and it is easier today to do so, due to there were some people in the past who did not identify the right type of career which led to a bright future and people today have more resources to get help from to i
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-07 | kameice | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-08 | amirbahman | 73 | view |
- Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 60
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past that they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 66
- In the past, it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure and successful future. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children's education than were parents in the past. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: EAGER_TO[1]
Message: With 'eager to', use the base form of the verb: 'put'.
Suggestion: put
People are always eager to put their energy and intelligence into thei...
^^^
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...eve a bright future. However, it is not a easy course for people to get a secure ...
^
Line 9, column 662, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iewed by the guiders, he gave me several job type suggestions which proved workin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8125 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67739495592 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4825 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 607.5 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.2189635631 48.9658058833 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.235294118 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5294117647 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52941176471 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346941638727 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992808988574 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920475746839 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220881932973 0.150856017488 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502771011396 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.