Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea?
Education is always a hot topic which has been talked for decades. Almost all the parents are eager to find good methods to improve their children's performace in school, especially for the grades. Among these parents, some of them considers that offering their schoold-age children money for each high grade they get in school is a good method, while others holds an opposite view. From my perspective, I believe it is a good idea.
First, money can act like a special reward for children when they get high grade, which will further encourage them to work harder in the next examination. When I was in middle shool, my parents uesd to give me money at this condition. Every time when I got such reward, I would feel very glad and the pleasant is even beyond the grade itself, and I regarded such money not only the reward but also the recognition from my parents. Thus, offering money for each high grade is a good for school-age children.
Second, when having received such extra money, school-age children need to elaborately plan how to spend it. This will help them to foster the money management idea. When I got such money from my parents, I usually chose to buy some study related stuffs, such as pens and books. I even used a specialized notebook to record each perchase. Therefore, offering school-age children money for each high grade also help them to learn how to manage their own money.
Last but not the least, knowing the fact that they can receive money when attaining the high grade also can make children more competive in the school. For example, children might be more concentrated in classes and eager to ask teachers mroe questions in order to get high grades. And this will improve the grade rank of shool-age children which finally makes them stand out in chool. So, offering the school-age children money for each high grade can also make them more competitive in school.
In a nutshell, there are definetly enormous efficient ways to improve school-age children's performance in school, and I consider offering money for each high grade is a good one because money can act as a special reward and further increase children's interest in study, it will help school-age students to manage their money better, and it can make students more competitive
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 66
- In the past, it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure and successful future. 73
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 66
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past that they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, such as pens and books. I even used a specialized notebook to record each perc...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, second, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85459183673 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46312744783 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477040816327 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.0074619897 48.9658058833 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.722222222 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.526224470981 0.236089414692 223% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196522025008 0.076458572812 257% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148810474929 0.0737576698707 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.352913281919 0.150856017488 234% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454817867185 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.