In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future

Considering life as a modern and new environment, most jobs and their requirement would change over the cores of time. Through passing this modern and technological environment people should adopt their job with updating demands. In fact, the development environment effectively influences on people careers which are really disastrous future job opportunities. As far as I am concern former life was so easier in case of a secure job following with success than newly. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, by developing technology some careers will obsolete and others will provide a new opportunity for individuals. As a result of this phenomenon, people may lose their position in some criteria which sound impossible and have changed their approach to deal with different issues. For example, consider the manufactures in the past which involved larger amounts of labors with itself to produce products. By increasing the level of technological material in modern days this manufactures had to abolish deluge number of the worker from that and use some development machines which is the symptom of modern societies. this change in this case clearly indicates the rule of advanced technology machines and their negative impacts on people’s careers which is quite arduous to control and manage it.
Second, due to the competitive environment that humane is experiencing, an abrupt change would have happened that everyone's career would be influenced by them. regardless of the sudden event that happens in every daily schedule of people's life finding a career and being successful in becoming risky and somehow chancy. In other words, people must be more conscious of their environment and adapt themselves to every new event. One of my own examples is a good case in point. I was working as an engineer in a large and safe economic company. An abrupt change happens in the world in case of infection disease, which Couse many negative effects on the world's job opportunity Since government and many companies had decided to spend their money to address this conflict which engaged all the people with itself, I loosed my job also I had to justify my career with new circumstances.
In conclusion, I firmly agree that finding a job in the former era was easier than today. It not only is for the development of technology but also is for sudden changes that are continually involved with the earth's problems.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 363, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ly disastrous future job opportunities. As far as I am concern former life was so ...
^^
Line 2, column 627, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ich is the symptom of modern societies. this change in this case clearly indicates t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Regardless
...nes career would be influenced by them. regardless of the sudden event that happens in eve...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, really, second, so, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, first of all, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2066.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07616707617 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82568955977 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525798525799 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4249094268 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.777777778 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6111111111 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161771958046 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556342256407 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586056449342 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108453364224 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587940612237 0.0645574589148 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.