in the past it was easir to identify what kind of career or job lead to successful future

Essay topics:

in the past it was easir to identify what kind of career or job lead to successful future

Nowadays, researches show that just hardworking and working a lot do not guarantee prosperous of a work rather than before. Increasing the number of jobless people who had their own work reveal that we cannot predict whether a job is successful in future or not. To some extent I subscribe to the idea that today some reasons caused that people cannot predict their job prosperous in future.
To begin with, the development of science and technology always change people’s need so it is hard for companies because their product should fulfill all of the humans need. Furthermore they should be up-to-date because the speed of such development is high enough to make some products useless. For example, about twenty years ago, companies which produced smartphone believed that their product will fulfill humans need until a century but after a while public enthusiastic toward their product decrease. People do not buy their product because they expect some new properties that never provide by this old products. The companies know that the speed of producing a material should be equal to rate of science development to be prosperous.
Second, today expectation of people from the companies and products changes and companies always should predict people’s opinion toward their job to preserve them for their future sells. Fulfillling all people’s need is hard and especially cost consuming for example they shoul provide after sell merits for them such as exchanging products. Furthermore when a company cannot satisfy their customers they will go to another company so the last company should try to absorb new ones.
However, I believe that some strategies such as appealing advertising or digital marketing help people to guarantee their sells approximately until two or three years. Many companies maintain their sells in a good situation by spending more budget on their advertising through TV, radio or street billboard.
In conclusion, contemplating on aforementioned reasons prediction of a successful future for a job is harder than past. Many factors make this prediction hard such as high speed development of science and technology or similarities of careers.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-06-01 reihanee 73 view
2019-06-01 reihanee 76 view
2019-06-01 reihanee 86 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 382, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ple cannot predict their job prosperous in future. To begin with, the development of sci...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 156, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...es because their product should fulfill all of the humans need. Furthermore they should be...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 179, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
... should fulfill all of the humans need. Furthermore they should be up-to-date because the s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ss. For example, about twenty years ago, companies which produced smartphone beli...
^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...s for them such as exchanging products. Furthermore when a company cannot satisfy their cus...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, second, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34393063584 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86631918893 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520231213873 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8408660681 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 123.266666667 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0589850452455 0.236089414692 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0287902945367 0.076458572812 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591973831323 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0489036017608 0.150856017488 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512833477569 0.0645574589148 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.