In the past, people ate food that was better for their health than they do today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that our eating habit has undergone a shift during last decade in the hectic city of life that most people lead. Various points of view which are germane to the matter being discussed brings us to the moot question as to whether the food we eat today is healthier than past. However, the popular sentiment to which I vehemently cling is that in spite of technological advancement and hygienic foods, the food we eat today is by far healthy than past time. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of issues in this framework.
To commence with, contrast the lives we are leading to those of our ancestors, our living condition and eating habit has undergone a transformation. Not only are our lives dependent on gadgets but also our eating, the food we eat and so forth, are changing at a very swift pace. Generally phrased, vast majorities of people are now eating fast-foods or prepared foods that are not nutritive and salubrious for the body. Not only can these foods affect our lives negatively but also can prevent us from leading a healthy life. As a tangible example, in the past decades, people were more careful and paid attention to their health by eating the vegetable, meaty food, home-made cooked and so on. Because of these eating habits, we are now witnessing that our progenitors were in a good shape. To elucidate more on this issue, in today's hectic world, vast majorities of individuals especially adults rely on prepared foods, which stopped them to remain healthy.
Another equally salient point in corroborating my stance on this subject is that due to human activities and their intervention in technology and agriculture, hardly can people now be well-off from hygienic and healthy crops. If we take a minute to ponder over it, in the past everything including crops and whole agricultural products were produced naturally without chemical substances, water contamination and so forth. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that foods we eat today is by far healthy and nutritive and does not provide an opportunity for families to stay healthy.
However, every coin has two sides. Nowadays, because of technological advancement and improved knowledge of agriculture rather than past time, today's foods are more nourishing and unctuous. In fact, in the past time owing to the paucity of nourishing and healthy meals, people suffered from various diseases that result in their death. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my viewpoint.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that our progenitors were more cognizant of the food they ate. Indeed, their meals contained nutritive and healthy substances that hardly can we find them in our meals. Agricultural products including crops, vegetable, cereal and so forth, were more salubrious than now and helped people to lead a healthy life owing to the fact that nowadays people think more of their income and revenue, not people's health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-27 | amirbahman | 73 | view |
- The primary function of the Committee for a Better Oak City is to advise the city government on how to make the best use of the city s limited budget However at some of our recent meetings we failed to make important decisions because of the foolish objec 77
- Workers in the small town of Leeville take fewer sick days than workers in the large city of Masontown, 50 miles away. Moreover, relative to population size, the diagnosis of stress-related illness is proportionally much lower in Leeville than in Masontow 59
- "Two years ago the city voted to prohibit skateboarding in Central Plaza. They claimed that skateboard users were responsible for the litter and vandalism that were keeping other visitors from coming to the plaza. In the past two years, however, there has 29
- Do you agree or disagree that progress is always good? 86
- The food we eat today is much healthier than in the past. Do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...iscussed brings us to the moot question as to whether the food we eat today is healthier than...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 491, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...ood we eat today is by far healthy than past time. The underlying aim of this essay is to...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...ed knowledge of agriculture rather than past time, todays foods are more nourishing and u...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...ourishing and unctuous. In fact, in the past time owing to the paucity of nourishing and ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that can lend weight to my viewpoint. In light of reasons elaborated, I reiter...
^^^
Line 9, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...income and revenue, not peoples health.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, well, as to, in fact, by and large, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2615.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 526.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97148288973 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78901763229 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71698280214 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498098859316 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 819.0 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.02498582 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.523809524 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0476190476 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04761904762 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174746890407 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566866132983 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407690146046 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108984091421 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249159112443 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.