It is true that we have heard reports of selfless generosity and kindness of past people.
However, it is baseless to say that people in the past time were more friendly. My standpoint is that people nowadays are more willing to help others due to technology and wealth. I will illustrate my points of view in the following two parts.
First of all, with the advancement in technology, it is more easier to pass on friendness. People have various technological means to offer help. In morfem-day China, social media apps and website have made it easier foe users to link their bank and Alipay accounts. The act of givind has become as easy as a few clicks on a smartphone without any cash changing hands. After you see news of some tradegy on TV, by scanning the barcode with your phone’s camera, you can donate immediately. This was impossible in the past. Social media has also made it easier to disseminate information about charities with a wider outreach, When one shares a link to a charitie site, and that share get shared and reshared by one’s friends, the effect is exponential.
Additionally, living standards have improved enormouly and this makes helping others possible. Basically, good economic times have resulted in people becoming more financially capable of supporting the causes they believe in. It is a given that people with more disposable income are more likely and in a better position to develop a desire to help others. Donations people make, ranging from clothes no longer worn anf books unread to unwanted furniture they want to replace, definitely help others who are less fortunate.
To sum it up, people are more helpful for two reasons: better financial condition and advanced technology.
- In the past people were more friendly than they are today Do you agree or disagree with the statement 78
- In the past people were more friendly than they are today. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? 71
- Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is often considered as a bad quality for a person. However, some people think that is a good quality for a person 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...t is baseless to say that people in the past time were more friendly. My standpoint is th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...ans to pass on their friendship. In the past time, the ways to convey information are jus...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Without
...hen arrest the thief. But, in the past. without the belief that policeman would arrive,...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... before due to technology and economic.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, as a result, first of all, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2257.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 465.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85376344086 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53132622172 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520430107527 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2322566282 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.6071428571 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6071428571 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178852390776 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516663303605 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703592041115 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134406213514 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630058453724 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.