People learn things better from those at their own level - such as fellow students or coworkers - than from those at a higher level, such as teacher or supervisors. There are probably a lot of people who agree with the idea which people learn things better from those at their own level rather than at a higher level
In the modern era, learning has become one of the most important part of every individual’s life. Learning process starts from home and never stops for a modern human as there are tremendous amount of knowledge and skill to be learnt. There has been an argument among education specialist whether people learn better from their peer groups like friends or co-workers or from higher level such as tutors or supervisors. As far as I am concerned, I believe that people learn better from higher level like teachers rather than own level. In what follows two elaborate reasons will vindicate my point of view.
The first vital point to bear in mind is that higher level instructors are trained to teach. Because they are trained to teach, learning process will become much easier for students. Not only they know how to teach but also they know what to teach that is practical for students or employees. Also higher level educators are required to teach using a comprehensive and to the point syllabus which both makes learning easier and includes all the necessary information for the students. For example consider medical school students. If students start to teach each other different thing the result might not be pleasant for the society health. It can go without saying that because higher level doctors teach there, learning time and process will be better for students and society.
The second noteworthy point to mention is that student might not be able to ask question from their own level friends and be ashamed of being judged. In every university class or work time class there are people who fear that their peer group think less of them provided asking questions others might think they are silly. According to a recent study students in higher level education are afraid of being judged by their classmate because they might think less of them. Also it suggested that the more complex the material to learn gets, the more the students’ willingness to ask the question declines. Take a personal experience as an example of this. My classmate was a shy person who did not participate in the class meetings because on those classes our professor had required every student to learn a specific matter and teach it into his/her own study group. He was afraid that if he couldn't learn from other students, he will be mocked by others and that was not pleasant for him. So he did not take part on those classes.
In conclusion, I believe that learning can be better from higher level educators since Higher level people are taught to teach and students feel comfortable around them to ask their question without the fear of being mocked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-12 | r.mahdavi70@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago, there was a mass-extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species. It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific arguments presented in the reading passage 3
- Which one do you prefer? Why? 1) a company offering you a job with challenging and interesting projects but less vacation days or 2) another company offering you a job that is not so challenging and interesting but has more vacation days. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- If people want to contribute to the society, which of the following is the best way?1. riding bicycle or walking on foot2. recycling the waste3. buying local organic food 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
... a modern human as there are tremendous amount of knowledge and skill to be learnt. Th...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...ucation specialist whether people learn better from their peer groups like friends or ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 480, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... concerned, I believe that people learn better from higher level like teachers rather ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...is practical for students or employees. Also higher level educators are required to ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 472, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... because they might think less of them. Also it suggested that the more complex the ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 583, Rule ID: ASK_THE_QUESTION[1]
Message: Use simply 'ask' instead.
Suggestion: ask
... more the students' willingness to ask the question declines. Take a personal experience as...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 897, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...n study group. He was afraid that if he couldnt learn from other students, he will be m...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...believe that learning can be better from higher level educators since Higher leve...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2221.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90286975717 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4547441517 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470198675497 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 658.8 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9794320715 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.761904762 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.45110844103 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306116750075 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924675680921 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927912190563 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213668213482 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082527022169 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.