People learn things better from those at their own level - such as fellows or co-workers-than from those at higher level, such as teachers or supervisors.
Opinions vary with the regard to the question of whether people should learn from close relatives or take into account the wisdom of grown-ups or supervisors. Although the opinions of teachers and supervisors based on their experience are highly valuable, I dare say that learning things from co-workers and generating ideas with fellows, who are not afraid of making their own mistakes, has its benefits. I firmly believe, that in order to succeed the one should behave appropriately with relatives in accordance with their “generation rules”.
To begin with, the opinions of experienced people, such as teachers or supervisors, are unquestionably valuable and should be taken into account. Their personal experience and special knowledge may foster the decrease in number of mistakes, which are taken by inexperienced people. For example, the supervisor or mentor may boost one’s career development through providing considerable number of valuable advises on the steps which should be taken further. Moreover, the lack of life experience make it hardly possible to make right career choices without comprehensive understanding of the possible consequences and results of those steps.
Nonetheless, learning things on one’s own level, cooperating with co-workers and fellows has its clear benefits. Making own mistakes usually is a more valuable thing and the easiest way to exclude repetition of them in the future. To be specific, the one’s life provides more lessons than a life of a teacher or a mentor, who obtained their personal life experience through making their own choices or taking advises from their relative or ancestors. Indeed, the more mistakes a person makes on his own, the better he understands the possible solutions of this mistakes.
In addition, the fellows usually better understand the generation with whom people on their level cooperate and may behave more appropriately than supervisors may advise them to behave. Hence, in order to grow in a company where bosses are relatively young, one should behave himself in a specific manner, which might significantly differ from those of teacher’s. Generations change rapidly and their habits so too. The one should be “on the same wave” as their current bosses, who, for example, may prefer doing sports in the middle of a working day.
All in all, besides that the successful person should base his personal decisions on experience from supervisors. The fear of making one’s own mistakes is greatly exaggerated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-28 | Winner_007 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-28 | Winner_007 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-28 | Winner_007 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-28 | Winner_007 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-28 | Winner_007 | 73 | view |
- People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellows or co workers than from those at higher level such as teachers or supervisors 76
- People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellows or co workers than from those at higher level such as teachers or supervisors 73
- As early as the twelfth century A D the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their great houses massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand three or four stories high Archaeologist 3
- Learning about the past has no value for those living in the present 81
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to so much information creates problems Which view do you agree with 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
Opinions vary with the regard to the question of whether people should learn from close relative...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e understands the possible solutions of this mistakes. In addition, the fellows us...
^^^^
Line 4, column 285, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a specific manner" with adverb for "specific"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...tively young, one should behave himself in a specific manner, which might significantly differ from ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, hence, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, for example, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2118.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3893129771 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89752955767 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516539440204 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7677924234 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.588235294 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1176470588 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255645029827 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800929923136 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672202236396 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138054367083 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625727091693 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.