People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only.
Controversy exists over whether what enhance the chance of people to be more successful. As far as I am concerned, people who learn multiple distinctive skills, tend to be more successful in the future because not only it helps them to find a proper job but also, it broadens their mind. In the following paragraphs, I will pinpoint my case.
The first reason worth mentioning is that knowledge of different skills enables people to have better chances to find job positions. In the modern life, the technology dramatically improved which alter people's career. With this advancement, multi-dicsiplinary fields such as machine learning and programming has emerged which have practical application in every areas. Hence, it is crucial for students to acquire these kind of knowledge to have a better future. For example, civil engineers have responsibilities in construction and design of buildings and after that, its job is done. However, nowadays, they have responsibilities to control the safety of buildings by using of signal processing needed knowledge of how to write a code and process it which was the responsibility of students studying electrcial and computer science engineering. Therefore, a person who have different skills can find jobs better since roles of jobs have been changed.
A furthure more subtle point is that learning far skills helps people to broaden their mind. Every skill has its unique characteristics made it different from other; Nevertheless, there is a fine connection between skills. If a person tracking the mentioned connection and overview each skills, it will improve his mind and get a far better perspective in comparsion to other human-beings. For instance, a student who has a basic knowledge of mathematic are more prone to be specialize in the math. If he acquire knowledge of programming and find the connection of these two, he acquires a great understanding enable him to use its application in both area. Instead of writing on papers, he can use programming language and prove a hyphothesis which it can not be done by a perons lack the knowledge of coding.
To make a long story short, based on the aforementioned arguments, due to having more chances to find jobs and developing the mind of people, people with many different skill have better chance of success. Therefore, it is highly recommended to people to study in different majors and experience them since it has various benefits.
- TPO 33 71
- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past. 71
- TPO 4 3
- TPO 13 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
..., it is crucial for students to acquire these kind of knowledge to have a better future. F...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 506, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'acquires'.
Suggestion: acquires
...one to be specialize in the math. If he acquire knowledge of programming and find the c...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...eloping the mind of people, people with many different skill have better chance of success. Th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, for instance, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2053.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15829145729 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09581693139 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537688442211 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1926485023 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.055555556 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254430819141 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795758134714 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798620639131 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174094062623 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566500023921 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.