People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only.
Multitasked and experienced in different fields are the most important pillars of each society in today's world. Due to the fact, we live in a chaotic and fast-paced world, it is important for us to have several skills at the same time. A controversial question that is often raised regarding this point is whether people who have different skills are successful or whether people who focus on one field. Some people possess the conviction that the latter is more beneficial, whereas I think, a person who has different skills is more successful. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs will represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind elucidating standpoint is that people who are multitasked have skilled brains. Their minds can process different tasks and they are able to analyze and notice different dimensions. It goes without saying, they can rely on their mind's abilities and create better solutions for their problems. Consider engineers who have abilities in calculation and analysis. When they want to solve a problem, they know there are different features that can affect the solutions and they choose better solutions. Thus, the driving force behind their success is their different skills.
The second rationale reason behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that multitasking and having different experiences, can increase a person's chance of getting success, especially in job offerings. Consider my experience to make this point more clear. When I wanted to hire my staff, I was cautious about their work experience and wanted them to do just one task. After a year, my company faced overpopulation and our costs grew. At that time, my father told me I could hire a person who can able to do multitask and I could reduce the cost and increase efficiency.
In brief, due to the aforementioned reasons, I think having different skills is more agreeable and we can achieve success because our solutions are more practical and, on the other hand, we have better opportunities. It is anticipated that for having a better society, we have to plan to teach our people to be multitasked.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions proposed in the reading passage 80
- In order to attract more tourists the government could either improve safety by hiring more police or improve its appearance by repairing old buildings and streets Which way do you think is more effective 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays it is easier to maintain good health than in the past 76
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement After completing high school students should take at least a year off to work or travel before they begin studying at a university Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...d elucidating standpoint is that people who are multitasked have skilled brains. Their ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 512, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...an affect the solutions and they choose better solutions. Thus, the driving force behi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, so, thus, whereas, i think, in brief, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06128133705 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82730491101 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520891364903 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5160826506 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.944444444 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9444444444 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298752984814 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959908890011 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118632931856 0.0737576698707 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182944353018 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11474677354 0.0645574589148 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.