A person should never make an important decision alone
As a coin has two sides, there are both positive and negative aspects of making major decisions by yourself. Making decision on your own can be challenging and onerous, some people might oppose that one should take decision alone. If I were forced to choose, I would certainly agree with the statement. There are enormous reasons why I agree with statement some of which I will discuss in subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, major decisions taken by consulting with someone experienced and someone that can guide you better, we can more carefully weigh our options. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. A few years ago when I purchased my first car, I did not realize that I was paying way more interest rate because I was not aware. Had I consulted with someone that was in a similar situation, I would not be paying excessive amount of interest today. Therefore, it is less risky if we take someone’s ideas in consideration.
Secondly, decisions taken alone can lead to a lot of negative aspects for the future. Sometimes wrong decisions taken can affect other people involved as well. For instance, my friend’s parents purchased a house the same day they went to look at, without even second guessing the neighborhood and the environment. Their impulsive and rash decisions not only affects them today but the entire family has to go through the consequences. Therefore our families, friends, coworkers can help us brainstorm and can also give us positive and negative aspects of the situation.
In the light of the above mentioned reason, I strongly agree that a person should never make important decision by themselves and always consult an experienced person or someone with vast knowledge about the situation that way we can avoid all possible mistakes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-13 | TatianaGHGH | 76 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | prakriti malla | 60 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 60 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 60 | view |
| 2022-12-03 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street while others think that it is the right thing to do Which point of view do you think is correct and why 60
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street while others think that it is the right thing to do Which point of view do you think is correct and why 60
- A person should never make an important decision alone 43
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street while others think that it is the right thing to do Which point of view do you think is correct and why 60
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street while others think that it is the right thing to do Which point of view do you think is correct and why 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 413, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will discuss in subsequent paragraphs. To begin with, major decisions taken by ...
^^^
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ily has to go through the consequences. Therefore our families, friends, coworkers can he...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 299.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99665551839 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77273460334 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.522159886 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24024228816 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683457421737 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968860557366 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157963848605 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123654529573 0.0645574589148 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.