A person should never make an important decision alone.
There is no denial to the fact that different people would have different opinions when faced with unprecedented situations, having to take an important and decisive decision. Well, according to me, I would always consider consulting some of my close and reliable well-wishers before coming to a definite conclusion. I shall corroborate my stance through a few well reasoned examples in the following paragraphs.
First, a decision taken after taking into account a variety of opinions usually help in mitigating risks of an emotional bias. Often times, we fail to keep our emotions aside and take cold blooded decisions, which affect the final outcomes. However, when we take into account the ideas of others, most of which are not guided by their emotions, it is easier to arrive at more logical and optimal solutions. I remember being able to defer my doctoral admissions and saving myself from the clutches of an exorbitant student loan after taking advice of my father. A spot in a PhD program had long been my dream. When denied a full scholarship, I was reluctant to waste a year and was about to opt for a huge student loan. It was at this point that my father advised to defer my admission and approach the problem in more realistic terms, thus saving me from a huge burden for the next four years.
Second, while single-handedly taking a decision, we often miss out on important nuances, leading to erroneous analysis of situations. There is always a risk of running into miscalculated risks, thus ending in deep waters. A joint decision, that tales into consideration an array of views, seldom has the same risk. While deciding on my diet plans before my university championship, I was lucky enough to get consultations from a dedicated team of dietitians, coaches and mentors. It was at this stage that I learned how I was on the verge of taking an erroneous decision of adopting for muscle cutting, instead of maintaining a calorie surplus that was necessary for me at that point.
Thus, as can be deciphered from the reasons above, an important decision must always be bolstered by concrete ideas taken from a varied number of individuals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-13 | TatianaGHGH | 76 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | prakriti malla | 60 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 60 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 60 | view |
| 2022-12-03 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
- The chemical compound ethanol has risen in recent years as the most viable alternative to fossil fuels Ethanol is a renewable fuel made from crops mainly from corn in the United States which can power engines There are many who argue that corn ethanol sho 80
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints re 73
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 58
- There is no shortage of opinion on whether it is better for students to learn art and literature or math and science In my opinion I disagree with the statement I think it is more important for people to study math and science The following paragraphs wil 52
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90983606557 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83203146551 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595628415301 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6893700347 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.3125 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0625 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104375638549 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.034692427762 0.076458572812 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450365826599 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788191654231 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289641738487 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.