The statement in question is true because the pets regardless of that they can't speak but feel the same as humans do. Pets in the family have sympathetic feeling for their owners or the family they live in. Pets in the form of dogs, cat, rabbit, etc have more feelings with whom they live and in turn they expect the same thing. In my opinion pets should not only be considered as a family member but more than that, as they are dependent on us like the children in the house.
As stated above the pets are like our children. The more we love and spent time with our children the more affection the child has with the parents. The same as with the animal. For example, when I was of 2, my father bought a puppy. We used to sleep, play, walk together. And the one incident that I remembered today; Once my father was ona business trip, and I was missing my father, but the important thing here is my dog too missed my father. I wasen't mature enough to understand at that time, but today I found the reason about the behavioral changes it had during that time.
Additionally, pets serve as a additional hand when one is running out of time or is in a danger. This incident is when I was of 9, and was learning to swim. Accidentally my small brother feel in the deep area and no one other than me and dog were present. As he understood the situation, immediately jumped in the pond and in mean time I ran to call my father. Dog gave me the extra time to call my father, by handling my brother in water.
The other incident, when my dog smelled the short circuit before any further damage could occur. From the above mentioned points, I can say that my dog treated me and my family like its family and whenever needed stood by the side like a caring family member and in turn pets should be considered as a family member as they really behave as family member.
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field. 58
- If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable. 58
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious. 50
- Tidal Power 73
- "One month ago, all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one-third of what it used to be. Although actual readings of water usage before and after the adjustment are n 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ecause the pets regardless of that they cant speak but feel the same as humans do. P...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n us like the children in the house. As stated above the pets are like our chil...
^^
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...at time. Additionally, pets serve as a additional hand when one is running out...
^
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needed stood" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'stood' or 'to be stood'.
Suggestion: stood; to be stood
...ily like its family and whenever needed stood by the side like a caring family member...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, really, so, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.28611898017 4.8611393121 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26098884489 2.67179642975 85% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512747875354 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9528091795 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0555555556 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6111111111 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.38888888889 5.45110844103 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230216144389 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682197477707 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115750177046 0.0737576698707 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157356677582 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133663639736 0.0645574589148 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 11.7677419355 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.6 10.9000537634 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.