Planning for modern world
Friendship has a myriad benefits for human beings which accumulative of its benefits could result in happiness. Some people find happiness in old friendships since they consider these kinds of friends reliable in different situations as well as enjoy the created sympathy with their friends. However, other people do not confine the benefits of friendship just to an old type of it and also see extra benefits through having new friends dynamically, including obtaining new experience and matching their friends with their up-to-date criteria. In my vantage point, the capability for finding new friends outweighs the ability of keeping long-time friendships in that not only new friends open new windows for each other, but also they meet each other's demands based on their latest period of life.
First point which is of paramount importance is that there is a meaningful correlation between the diversity of shared experiences and the number of people who gather together. Every individual has a specific story which has been captured during his/her journey in life. Creation of new connections with new friends, bring their backgrounds and many useful experiences to our lives. These potential achievements could not be found easily by limiting the connections to a limited number of friends since every person has a main focus on a specific field. In contrast, having diverse friends have a wider range of knowledge. For example, some people do not confine themselves to their university classmates and find new friends from other fields and due to
this, their knowledge is more diversified.
Furthermore, people change during their lives and their attitudes change to everything such as the type of personalities that prefer to have friends. In this case, people who are able to find new friends, will be more satisfied since they could have new friends who are as much compatible as possible with their ideals. For example, some people do not get married ever, but some people create a family. People who live in the format of family, will be more satisfied if they have friends who they also have a family to connect members of family with each other -children and wifes/husbands- which finally increase happiness.
In conclusion, there is compelling evidence which makes sense that the ability for finding new friends could be more effective from the happiness viewpoint.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-24 | all30of4 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-07 | Uhernandes95 | 38 | view |
| 2020-09-17 | 2207922737 | 87 | view |
| 2020-07-12 | tatagol | 3 | view |
| 2020-05-17 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 83 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ased on their latest period of life. First point which is of paramount import...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 528, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...ber of friends since every person has a main focus on a specific field. In contrast, havin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 760, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...new friends from other fields and due to this, their knowledge is more diversifie...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their knowledge is more diversified. Furthermore, people change during their ...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s- which finally increase happiness. In conclusion, there is compelling evide...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21298701299 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72076651269 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498701298701 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.1357919645 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.8 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0505141880915 0.236089414692 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0226482148312 0.076458572812 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323478071953 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0335563225689 0.150856017488 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241003408082 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.