PO-04 - Independent Writing Task
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Technology nowadays are fast approaching, new developments are currently being in place for use. Twenty years from now, science and technology would be vastly used in the market. In my opinion, car usage would tremendously double in size than today due to outbreak in technology in automobile. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, Scientist and engineers are working hard to provide the best technology they could offer to expand the horizon in providing smart cars, which is energy efficient and cost efficient. As of today, there are few smart cars in the market that in used by the people and the community, the impact on this technology has been huge and government are encouraging these companies to build more of this smart cars in the future. My own experience is a compelling example of this. I owned one of this smart car, and I can attest to it that it is efficient to use and doesn't harm the environment by emitting toxic substances in the air which results in global warming. Owners of these smart cars are making a petition to the congress to support the manufacturers to produce smart cars in the future, thus, the benefits of it out weights the older technology of cars we are using today. For this reason, I Strongly believe that production of automobile would increase twenty years from now.
Secondly, new approaches in automobile technology is being tested to provide alternative means of transportation such as, flying cars whereas it could lessen the use of roads. This break through in science could lessen traffic situation here in Mexico. For instance, Scientist are advertising that they engineered this kind of flying cars and it can be used for couple of years from now. My friends and I would support this kind of automobile, due to it would be top of the line and can eradicate the problems in traffic in roads. Many advancement are still on its way to perfection, but, people are enthusiastic on this kind of science. Accordingly, I think that with this kind of technology can lead to advantageous on our part, thus, the production of flying could doubled in number in years to come.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that in twenty years from now many technology and out break in automobile will surface within our country. This is because it can solve problems in global warming, traffic congestion in roads.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | nusybah | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | Luis Cortes | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | amitupretii | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | M.S 2019 | 3 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | shaima900 | 70 | view |
- TPO 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- TPO 42 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your an 73
- TPO 50- Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s, Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is. Thus th 3
- TPO 26- The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot be stopped and that it pos 61
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hy 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: double
...y opinion, car usage would tremendously double in size than today due to outbreak in technolog...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cars in the future. My own experience is a compelling example of this. I owned on...
^^
Line 3, column 572, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...t to it that it is efficient to use and doesnt harm the environment by emitting toxic ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 532, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun advancement seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much advancement', 'a good deal of advancement'.
Suggestion: Much advancement; A good deal of advancement
...icate the problems in traffic in roads. Many advancement are still on its way to perfection, but...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 769, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'double'
Suggestion: double
...t, thus, the production of flying could doubled in number in years to come. In concl...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 65, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun technology seems to be countable; consider using: 'many technologies'.
Suggestion: many technologies
...y believe that in twenty years from now many technology and out break in automobile will surfac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, second, secondly, so, still, thus, whereas, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, kind of, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82608695652 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73947547861 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473429951691 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6420789762 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.45110844103 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163627383421 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585098944801 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394341880075 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107993649391 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370172065884 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.