Question:
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people believe that ability to interact well with people is the most important characteristic which helps to find a lucrative job, but there are doubts about whether such a statement bears much truth. However, the opponents still challenge that opinion, stating that studying carefully in school rather than socializing is a highly needed skill needed for success in a future job. While there is much to consider and contrast between both fields of thought, I concur with the latter opinion and have two reasons for doing so. Still, this deserves further speculation and scrutiny, which I will delve into.
To begin, by studying vigorously at school, people will gain profound knowledge of a subject, which helps them to find a profitable job. Even though the skill of relating well with people is useful, still without knowledge, it makes little value. I have to admit that my example has profoundly influenced my opinion on this matter. At university, my friend and were studying theoretical physics and, after graduation, planned to apply for postdocs in Princeton. Tremendously hard was it for us not only because we were obliged to have a profound comprehension of the subject but also because of high competition for that job. On the one hand, it took me blood, sweat, and tears to study Physics for almost ten hours a day, which resulted in outstanding grades. On the other hand, my friend, Andrew, was studying less and used the time to socialize with other students and professors, since he thought that this skill would help him to find a lucrative job in Princeton. After graduation, we both applied to Princeton and had an interview. As a result, because I had deep knowledge, it helped me to get the job there, while Andrew was rejected because of lower comprehension of the subject. If he had worked hard at university, he would have gotten the lucrative job we dreamed about since sophomore year.
Furthermore, by studying arduously, people learn an invaluable characteristic of being insistent and deal with problems effectively, which makes it easier to find a fruitful job. Even though without this characteristic, it is possible to find a job with the help of social skills, still without persistence, it is impossible to succeed there. For example, after Andrew was rejected, one of the professors with whom he builds relationships helped him to find a position at Stony Brook University. Not only was he fired from this university, but he also decided to leave the academical society. This is related to the fact that his task was to solve the problem in nonstationary quantum field theory, which contained very cumbersome calculations and a vast amount of time to calculate. Since he was not used to hard work from university and was not persistent, he failed. If he had been working vigorously at university and gained insistency, he would not have had such problems in life.
In light of the reasons mentioned above, I firmly believe that hard work rather than the skill of relating well with people is of great importance for finding a lucrative job. This is because not only learning gives excellent knowledge but also helps to develop persistence, which is a valuable component for future success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-01 | Verman94 | 71 | view |
| 2023-02-17 | zaid | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-30 | Umme Abiha | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | anman | 70 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | Kalyani_tekade_24 | 85 | view |
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone online games and social networking Web site Use specific reasons and exa 73
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Grades marks encourage students to learn Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Question Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age and should spend most of their time on school studies Others believe that young children should spend most of their time playing Compare these two views Which 73
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 924, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help him find' instead.
Suggestion: help him find
... since he thought that this skill would help him to find a lucrative job in Princeton. After gra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, still, well, while, as to, for example, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2698.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 541.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98706099815 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82280071112 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81346535035 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480591497227 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 829.8 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 13.0 3.51792114695 370% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7529706657 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.304347826 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5217391304 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82608695652 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225530903723 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684949170495 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620264358157 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173688694312 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687871696839 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.