Question:
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays the concurrency obliges the companies to work faster and better. They have a great risk of losing market share if they do not do so, thus they assume risks during its operation in order to get things done. However, the safety of the workers is priority for me and I am against to work quickly and risk making mistakes.
Firstly, when operations are done on their own time and people make sure everything is right, the probability that something goes wrong is minimum. The employees have time to check the work and ask for advice if they have doubt on what action take. Knowing that they can count on the superiors for advice and that there is no hurry to finish the job, they work with a lower level of stress. This contributes to a better work environment and motivates the employees to work better.
Secondly, whether an employee gets hurt during the job operation, the company can face a major lawsuit from the government. The government can understand that as the company putting the profits as priority rather the employees’ life. It gets worst if the employees confirm that the company pressed them to assume risk-making mistakes. The public image of the company is affected as well, newspapers give attention and publish about accidents and depending on how it happened, and the community where the company is installed can run against it. Besides having to pay a fee in a probable lawsuit, the image of the company is harshly affected.
For these reasons, I believe that is more important to work slowly and make sure everything is correct than work quickly and risk making mistakes. The employees have a better professional environment because they know there is no hurry to get the work done. In addition, the companies avoid financial losses and a bad image to the community as the outcome of an accident and demonstrate to all stakeholders that the safety of the workers is the priority.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | pooria | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Raziya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
- Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses to explain this decline.One hypothesis 80
- Teachers should encourage theirs students to question everything. 60
- Question:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons and examples to support your 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 330.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64493382358 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512121212121 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5910735927 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213629732706 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812520297066 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108993337419 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152184246493 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0868340702373 0.0645574589148 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.