Schools always collect information about teachers' teaching performance and give rewards to those teachers who perform well. Which way do you think is more useful?
1. to evaluate teachers' performance by students
2. to evaluate teachers' performance by teachers
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Currently, with the burgeoning development of the economic, an increasing number of individuals are stimulated to pursue their dreams. Under the circumstance, a bunch of individuals reckon that the more ambitious the dream is, the more achievement they may achieve, thus they keep pursuing the ambitious targets. Whereas, some individuals believe merely the realistic goals are plausible. Personally speaking, I prefer the second kind of opinions and there are a couple of reasons to account for my points of view.
To start with, it is a terrific approach to reinforce their confidence to concentrate on realistic goals. Each time they accomplish their little targets, they obtain the sense of accomplishment, which enables them to enhance their self-confidence. On the contrary, those individuals with ambitious dreams cannot fulfill their tasks and what they persist on may even offer poor value for them, which not only saps their enthusiasm for the ambitious targets but also dampens their confidence or plagues them with self-doubts. For instance, one of my best friends, Rebecca, set her goal as being admitted by the top key universities. Hard as she studied, her academic performance cannot be significantly enhanced. Worse still, due to the large quantities of time was distributed to learn physics at the aim of ranking the first from the department, her English also suffered, which enslaved her with self-doubt that whether she was suitable for studying. The example illustrates that setting some tremendously ambitious goals is likely to impede us from achieving success since the obstacles we are confronted with makes us lose confidence progressively.
What’s more, it is more feasible for us to pursue realistic goals. The realistic goals are definite enough for us to schedule our plans. Meanwhile, since the realistic goals are usually temporary, the plans we make are likely to be implemented without the disrupting external factors. The research conducted in Harvard University to evaluate individuals’ capabilities of making achievements demonstrates that those children with small but feasible goals in their future lives tend to become outstanding in some specific domains, like the theoretical physics, anthropology or architects. Conversely, those children who once set ambitious goals for their future lives are likely to perform poorly in their careers, even some of them are not capable of making their ends meet by themselves. This experiment demonstrates that it is more feasible to pursue nominal goals and the accumulation of fulfilling the nominal goals enables the individual to make more achievements.
Admittedly, it seems that the ambitious dreams are relatively appealing, nevertheless, the nominal goals also enable us to accomplish ambitious goals, since every time we fulfill the nominal goals we adjust the plan to pursue the next nominal goals, and during the process of accumulation, the ambitious targets can be attained.
In a nutshell, it is an optimal method of insisting on pursuing the realistic goals, since it not only enables us to achieve the ambitious targets by the progressive accumulation but also fosters our self-confidence by offering the sense of accomplishment.
- Parents offer money for their school-age children for each high grade 73
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 73
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past that they were nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 87
- Your community has a piece of land and is considering introducing a business to this land 73
- University should allocate funds to increase professors salaries so as to improve the quality of education 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ey keep pursuing the ambitious targets. Whereas, some individuals believe merely the re...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, still, thus, whereas, while, even so, for instance, kind of, on the contrary, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2744.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 500.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.488 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12549260118 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 847.8 618.680645161 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.1320646547 48.9658058833 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.421052632 100.406767564 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3157894737 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21052631579 5.45110844103 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0602164808116 0.236089414692 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0228809655623 0.076458572812 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337183775275 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0286294468533 0.150856017488 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352009631001 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 11.7677419355 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 58.1214874552 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 86.8835125448 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.