Schools always collect information about teachers' teaching performance and give rewards to those teachers who perform well. Which way do you think is more useful?
1. to evaluate teachers' performance by students
2. to evaluate teachers' performance by teachers
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Currently, the whole society has witnessed an unprecedented development of the education industry, therefore there is an increasing bunch of individuals putting more emphasis on the quality of education, especially teachers' teaching performance. Some of them come up with the idea that they can incentivize teachers by giving awards to them based on the evaluation of their performance, hence triggering a heated discussion about whose assessment is more useful, students or teachers? A myriad of individuals harbor the idea that the evaluation of teachers' performance is supposed to be conducted by their colleagues, other teachers. However, personally speaking, I stand on the opposite sides. I concur with the opinion that merely students are entitled to evaluate teachers' performance and my view can be substantiated as follows.
To start with, assessing teachers' performance by students is fairer than the evaluation conducted by teachers. To be more specific, students are more likely to take the assessment more seriously. They will read the guidance offered by schools to score teachers' performance guided by each regulation instead of just giving scores randomly or intentionally lowering the score of specific teachers that they harbor resentment to, which means the possibility of rebellion behaviors is relatively low and this can be ignored. On the contrary, teachers fail to give an unprejudiced evaluation. On one hand, as for those schools employing the evaluation results as the foundation of awards, there is a propensity that teachers will compete with each other and maliciously make bad assessments for others, which not only ruins other teachers' reputation but also exerts detrimental effects on the advancement of schools. On the other hand, even though teachers will not be enslaved by the vicious competition, owing to their fear of spoiling their relationship, they are likely to give a good score regardless of how poor their colleagues' performance is at class. Hence, teachers, influenced by their biased standpoint, are not plausible to evaluate other teachers' performance.
What's more, students' evaluation is more rewarding. It is widely acknowledged that the teaching syllabus or schedule is not fixed and teachers will adjust the syllabus in accordance with students' feedbacks and their mastery of inculcated knowledge, therefore the evaluation conducted by students renders teachers a terrific opportunity to interact with students and have a more comprehensive understanding of their mastery of knowledge. Based on the comments collected from the evaluation, teachers are capable of adjusting their pace of imparting knowledge. Meanwhile, students' sentiments toward teachers' pedagogical methods or other characteristics can also be reflected in the assessment results, thus teachers can employ the suggestions given by students to improve their teaching performance. Since all advice is provided by students who directly receive education from them, it is apparent that teachers' adjustment can exert great impacts on students' academic performance.
Admittedly, evaluation conducting by teachers is not without merits. Teachers, who once received the common systematic education, are more adept in evaluating their coworkers in different but all-around aspects. Nevertheless, since the assessment is conducted at the aim of improving or enhancing the education quality, students ought to be taken into consideration initially, instead of teachers who are not direct receptacles of teaching.
In a nutshell, I would like to reiterate my opinion that teachers' teaching performance should be assessed by students since students are more unprejudiced and their feedbacks are of dominant significance in the improvement of education quality.
- Technology desighed to make people's lives simpler actually makes people's livies more complicated 90
- Factors influencing making major purchase 73
- What is the most important factor that affect the lasting time of a friendship?help each other at difficult timehave same intereststrust each other completely 73
- It is easier to be well-educated today than it is in the past. 90
- Imagine you need to improve your performance in order to get better grades or higher work payment which way would you choose 1 doing more extra work or assignments that are required 2 participate more actively or contributing your own idea more frequently 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 252, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...he guidance offered by schools to score teachers performance guided by each regulation i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 825, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
... for others, which not only ruins other teachers reputation but also exerts detrimental ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 912, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... effects on the advancement of schools. On the other hand, even though teachers wi...
^^
Line 2, column 1247, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...nt, are not plausible to evaluate other teachers performance. Whats more, students eval...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...o evaluate other teachers performance. Whats more, students evaluation is more rewar...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 900, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ducation from them, it is apparent that teachers adjustment can exert great impacts on s...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, as for, on the contrary, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 15.1003584229 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 89.0 52.1666666667 171% => OK
Nominalization: 43.0 8.0752688172 532% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3211.0 1977.66487455 162% => OK
No of words: 563.0 407.700716846 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70337477798 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87110059796 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18092781901 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48134991119 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1003.5 618.680645161 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.4111239074 48.9658058833 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.904761905 100.406767564 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8095238095 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.19047619048 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327434369519 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127271419125 0.076458572812 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532667300174 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209159286712 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614709642775 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 11.7677419355 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 58.1214874552 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 10.9000537634 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 165.0 86.8835125448 190% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.