These days, many schools let students evaluate their teacher.This system did not exist before, recently, it is carried out. This system cannot have been created for no reasons. Today, I will tell you why students evaluate their teacher for two parts;help for students, benefit for teacher.
First, students can get help. Some teachers who still beat students or say bad words to students. In the past, there was not thing that students could do in these situations. However, now students also evaluate teachers, so those teachers can not ignore them anymore. Also, some teachers do not teach and give free time to students. For example, there used to be a teacher at our school who hit the students everyday. Therefore, we honestly wrote it down on the evaluation sheet since then the teacher has been expelled from our school.
Moreover, it helps teachers. Most students can not speak well to the teacher directly even if their teachers’ class is fast, slow or difficult. Thus, the teacher can look at our assessment and improve the class. For instance, before science teachers used to teach class as hard as studying in college. Therefore, we wrote down that the class was so difficult when evaluating. We were worried that our teacher would be disappointed in us, but he rather thanked us for knowing about it.
This is why the schools should ask students to evaluate their teachers. School is a space where teachers and students are together. Accordingly, evaluating each other is mutually beneficial.
- As you read the passage below, consider how Jimmy Carter uses • evidence, such as facts or examples, to support claims. • reasoning to develop ideas and to connect claims and evidence. • stylistic or persuasive elements, such as 70
- TPO-09 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- As you read the passage below consider how Paul Bogard uses evidence such as facts or examples to support claims reasoning to develop ideas and to connect claims and evidence stylistic or persuasive elements such as w 73
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago, there was a mass-extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species. It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...ols let students evaluate their teacher.This system did not exist before, recently, ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...cher at our school who hit the students everyday. Therefore, we honestly wrote it down o...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, honestly, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 52.1666666667 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 1977.66487455 64% => OK
No of words: 251.0 407.700716846 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05179282869 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56314362508 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621513944223 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 618.680645161 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.464003134 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 66.7368421053 100.406767564 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2105263158 20.6045352989 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.10526315789 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291852766817 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0975586277507 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765267942377 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204672341346 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716512898162 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 58.1214874552 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.1575268817 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.12 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.