Should government increase limitations on foreign import to increase job in nation
Limiting of foreign imports has been a debatable topic for a very long time now. Some nations support this idea while some other nations very openly criticise the idea. I personally feel that limiting the foreign imports to increase jobs in the nation is not a very good idea.
First of all, limiting imports will decrease the sense of competition in the nation. Moreover, it would lead to increase in the prices of the goods. As we see today due to the import from other nations even the local manufacturers keep their price minimal so as to compete with the foreign goods. This helps the consumer to get the goods at a reasonable price.
In addition to the previous point, allowing foreign imports increases variety in the market. In other words, consumer gets to choose from a wide variety of products. It increases the need for innovation and hence encourages the company to focus more on research and development. For example, if we look at the television industry due to imports from other nations we get to choose from a various types of televisions. Moreover, still new technologically advanced televisions are coming up in the market everyday.
To summarise, I feel that government should encourage foreign imports and not limit them. It helps to keep the price of the items in check. Moreover, it increases variety in the market. All in all, making the consumers happy.
- Should government increase limitations on foreign import to increase job in nation 66
- Should government increase limitations on foreign import to increase job in nation 60
- Should government increase limitations on foreign import to increase job in nation 60
- My way of life versus my parents way of life Which way of life would you want future generations to follow 65
- my way of life versus my parents 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: FOREIGN_IMPORT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'imports'.
Suggestion: imports
Limiting of foreign imports has been a debatable topic for a very l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: FOREIGN_IMPORT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'imports'.
Suggestion: imports
...ea. I personally feel that limiting the foreign imports to increase jobs in the nation is not a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... manufacturers keep their price minimal so as to compete with the foreign goods. This he...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: FOREIGN_IMPORT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'imports'.
Suggestion: imports
...ddition to the previous point, allowing foreign imports increases variety in the market. In oth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: LOOK_WATCH[3]
Message: Did you mean 'watch'?
Suggestion: watch
...rch and development. For example, if we look at the television industry due to impor...
^^^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'type'?
Suggestion: type
...nations we get to choose from a various types of televisions. Moreover, still new tec...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 504, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...televisions are coming up in the market everyday. To summarise, I feel that governmen...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 55, Rule ID: FOREIGN_IMPORT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'imports'.
Suggestion: imports
...I feel that government should encourage foreign imports and not limit them. It helps to keep th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, look, moreover, so, still, while, as to, for example, i feel, in addition, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 15.1003584229 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1153.0 1977.66487455 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 236.0 407.700716846 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88559322034 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.48103885553 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66375156368 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 212.727598566 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53813559322 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 618.680645161 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.781430351 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.0625 100.406767564 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.75 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415243915436 0.236089414692 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132045201262 0.076458572812 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133970177144 0.0737576698707 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253507017711 0.150856017488 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664793289347 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.49 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.