Should the government invest money to improve Internet access or public transportation?
People often possess the different perspective on whether the government should invest money to improve Internet access or public transportation. Based on my personal experience and observation of life, I strongly argued that the government should invest money to improve public transportation.
First of all, the government is concerned about reputation, and investing money to improve public transportation can provide the government with the great reputation. For example, the Taiwanese government decided to spend a great amount of money on the investment of public transportation in Taipei city. Most people appreciated it because the traffic jam in the city almost disappeared after the public transportation system was finished. As a result, the government gained more than 70 percent of support on the annual questionnaire.
Secondly, the government puts emphasis on citizens, and funding money to improve public transportation is more beneficial to citizens. For instance, the public transportation in Japan cost the Japanese government over 30 percent of its annual budget. However, the public transportation in Japan is extremely well-developed and convenient. Actually, people can go everywhere from Tokyo with the help of public transportation. On the other hand, if the Japanese government chose to invest on Internet access. Citizens could not benefit from the convenience of the public transportation.
Last but not least, the government cares about the environment, and improving public transportation can help the government reduce environmental pollution. For example, the air pollution caused by cars in China was severe in 1990s, and the Chinese government came up with the idea of improving public transportation. After the subway system finished, people started to take subway more frequently rather than drive themselves. Hence, the amount of pollution gas caused by cars decreased dramatically after the subway system was constructed.
In conclusion, I maintain that the government should invest money to improve public transportation. After all, the government places emphasis on reputation, citizens, and environment.
- TPO53 Integrated writing 3
- TPO21 Integrated writing 80
- school used to offer three after-class activities.1)sports 2)art 3)volunteeringļ¼but this year, school's extra money may only can offer one activity. Which one do you choose and why? 73
- People are easier to get educated today than in the past 80
- TPO42 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...tion caused by cars in China was severe in 1990s, and the Chinese government came up wit...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, after all, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 43.0788530466 19% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 40.0 8.0752688172 495% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 316.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83227848101 4.8611393121 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36542710267 2.67179642975 126% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477848101266 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1251556452 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.388888889 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27777777778 5.45110844103 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.584635651485 0.236089414692 248% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20231732279 0.076458572812 265% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160871857794 0.0737576698707 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.378918090852 0.150856017488 251% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126102680815 0.0645574589148 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 58.1214874552 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 10.9000537634 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.