Various conditions in different regions might lead to a discrepant option on whether subsidize roads and highways or public transportation. Well, I hold the view that spending money on the former one might be a better choice according to my experience. However, some persons disagree with this assertion on account of their own consideration. And I will illustrate my opinion with reasons by the conjunction of economic development, the employment rate and citizens' lives.
First and foremost, the improvement of roads and highways might be more efficient to the development of economy in a city. Initially, enhancing roadways makes the transportation from others cities more rapidly, which correspondingly attracts more trucks and wares importing towards our cities. Furthermore, it is because the convenience of the highways that enterprises and investors pay more attention on our cities' progression and invest their money to the industrial districts. Obviously, possessing more money is beneficial to citizens from various aspects, also including using investment bringing by roadways to improve the public vehicles. Comparably, the economic advantage brought by spending money on public transportation is the efficiency of the commute. Accordingly, option to improve highways and roads, combining possible income from import and potential economic proliferation bringing about by investment, is better.
Also, from employment rate aspect, investment on roads and highways shows more benefits on employment. The expansion of economy growth might lead to an industrial enlargement such as the mass production and new factories founded. So there is a corresponding increasing demand on workers and directors for those production and manufactories. Apparently, this approach will decrease unemployment rate and also attract more employees from other cities to work here. In contrast, whereas subsidizing the public transportation can only offer several occupations like drivers and repairers, so the rate is unable to be more drastically influenced.
Last but not least, if the highways towards other places are more time-saving citizens are likely to find more approaches to recreate themselves outside cities. In the past, if individuals must cost 2 hours to go to a place of interest located in an adjacent area, in all likelihood, people would not spend that much of time to entertain themselves. But, nowadays, with the development and perfect of the highways, people are able to not only spend their time to nearby famous places but also can have meals or go camping to other cities only in half an hour. On the contrary, options to enhance transportation will not show this effect. Indeed, subsidizing the roads and highways provide more entertainment with citizens.
All in all, surging economy, higher employment rate and abundant recreation are three main reasons why I choose the former option, to invest the roads and highways.
- Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay. 76
- The expression “Never, never give up” means to keep trying and never stop working for your goals. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in sponsoring arts than in athletics (like state Olympics team). 3
- You have received a gift of money. The money is enough to buy either a piece of jewelry you like or tickets to a concert you want to attend. Which would you buy? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and examples t 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 755, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...lic transportation is the efficiency of the commute. Accordingly, option to improve highway...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 306, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this production' or 'those productions'?
Suggestion: this production; those productions
...ing demand on workers and directors for those production and manufactories. Apparently, this app...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, whereas, in contrast, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 8.0752688172 372% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2504.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 451.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55210643016 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12016647988 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538802660754 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 765.0 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5491003267 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.238095238 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4761904762 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95238095238 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239558269358 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707026113621 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526202263749 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122657130548 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683371575413 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 86.8835125448 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.