Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.

Various changes in different domains are happening every day, especially in technological, economic and political regions. Some people attribute their unhappiness to the constant changes. However, I disagree with the former assertion from three aspects which will be elaborated as follows.

First and foremost, technology improvement brings satisfaction to this society. Technology simplifies life from discrepant regions which make people more happy and satisfied than before. From the prospective of transportation, the invention of trains and airplanes bring convenience to people. By using these inventions, long-distant commute is much easier and journal might be more enjoyable. People can save time to do more favorite things. As for recreation, technique development such as TV, Internet and cell phone, are advantageous to interpersonal association. Individuals can easier satisfy themselves by watching TV, surfing on the Internet and communicating with friends by phones. Also, new media is generated which bring immediacy in to our life, such as Twitter. President Donald Trump said that the immediacy that Twitter affords him is the reason why he tweets, noting that press conferences and press releases take too long to reach the public. Therefore, technological changes indeed make people more frightened.

Furthermore, increase economy enriches the physical and spiritual domains of social people. Physically, economic proliferation bring more salaries to workers, accordingly, people will have enough money to buy what they want to buy. On the contrary, when the average GDP in China was under 200$ in 1960s, due to the paucity of food and money, a financial crisis caused dramatic death. On the other hand, spiritually, thanks to the economic growth, government spends increasing amount of money on establishment of auditoriums, local parks and art museum. Hence, people are more easily to entertain themselves, do exercise and enjoy art, which are impossible in the 1950s in China. Compared with the old day when people were suffering hunger and poverty, economy definitely bring physical and spiritual satisfaction into our life.

Last but not least, political changes cause peace. It is undeniable that, in the old days, especially during 1950s, wars and criminals are the main problems all over the world, terrorism penetrate one third of land on earth. But, after the diplomacy disseminates every corner of the earth, majority of countries are now under peace. No one can deny that peace is the greatest happiness for human beings.

All in all, although some people are unhappy towards the ever-changing world, virtually all of us are enjoy convenience of life, the enrichment of society and the peace of world.

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$200'.
Suggestion: $200
...when the average GDP in China was under 200$ in 1960s, due to the paucity of food an...
^^^^
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1960s'.
Suggestion: in the 1960s
...the average GDP in China was under 200$ in 1960s, due to the paucity of food and money, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1950s'.
Suggestion: during the 1950s
...iable that, in the old days, especially during 1950s, wars and criminals are the main proble...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 103, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'enjoyed'.
Suggestion: enjoyed
...changing world, virtually all of us are enjoy convenience of life, the enrichment of ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, third, as for, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2326.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 421.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52494061758 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94493330634 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624703087886 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3509626806 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9166666667 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5416666667 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70833333333 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18718199906 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469680121185 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050972722555 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962882082307 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202115973255 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.